Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Newser - Current News - Breaking Stories

SPONSORED NEWS ARCHIVE

Supreme Court takes up drug warning labels.(USA)(United States Supreme Court)

Article from: The Christian Science Monitor Article date: November 03, 2008 Author: Richey, Warren

Byline: Warren Richey Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON -- The US Supreme Court is examining whether medical patients can sue a pharmaceutical manufacturer over the adequacy of a drug's warning label.

The issue arises in the case of a Vermont musician whose right arm had to be amputated after she experienced a negative reaction to an injected antinausea drug.

Diana Levine, a professional guitarist, sued drugmaker Wyeth, claiming that the company had given insufficient warning of the possible severe effects of its product. A Vermont jury awarded ...

Read the rest of this article with a Free Trial at HighBeam Research.
Newser gathers stories from across the web and packs what you need to know into about 120 words.
Check out these stories related to your search. Visit our grid for the latest news.

Supremes Won't Air Dirty Laundry

Posted Nov 3, 08 3:59 PM CST in US Crime & Courts 

Supremes Won't Air Dirty Laundry
Source: AP Photo/Chris Pizzello

(Newser) – Election Day is likely to inspire swearing in some places and sure to see off-color language in one unlikely locale: the Supreme Court. But the American public will have to wait until next summer to hear tomorrow's oral arguments in a landmark indecency case, FCC vs. Fox, the Justices ruled today. "We are disappointed," a spokesman for C-SPAN, which had pushed for the audiotape release, tells Broadcasting & Cable.

The case concerns a lower court's ruling that the FCC's arbitrarily enforced its rule against "fleeting expletives"—notably when Bono crossed the line during a music awards show—virtually requiring that lawyers for both sides swear a blue streak. The court today heard oral arguments in Wyeth v. Levine. The pharmaceutical company lost a $7.3 million judgment against a musician whose forearm was amputated as the result of side effects from a migraine drug.

More about:  US Supreme Court FCC Fox obscenity Bono profanity Wyeth C-SPAN

MORE RELATED NEWSER STORIES

 Supremes to Weigh
 On-Air Swearing 

Fox battles the FCC in next big court case

(Newser) - The Supreme Court might take up a gavel in one hand and a bar of soap in the other next term, when it considers a case challenging the FCC’s “fleeting utterances” standards, it announced today. The FCC is appealing a lower-court ruling—which arose when Cher dropped an F-bomb during a 2002 Fox broadcast—that it has failed to “articulate a reasoned basis” for the rules. More »

'Wardrobe Malfunction' Case Bound for Supreme Court

Agency encouraged by Fox obscenity case

(Newser) - The FCC is continuing to push the "wardrobe malfunction" case and has turned to the Supreme Court, Broadcasting & Cable reports. The agency is attempting to have its $550,000 fine reinstated against CBS for Janet Jackson’s disrobing during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show. A federal appeals court threw out the fine in July. More »

MSNBC Slaps Tape Delay on Scarborough

Parenting groups applaud response to Morning Joe's F-bomb

(Newser) - MSNBC is putting a 7-second muzzle on Joe Scarborough, after the Morning Joe host accidentally uttered the F-word during Monday’s show. Though cable networks are immune from FCC decency rules, MSNBC confirmed that it was instituting the delay to prevent a repeat incident and noted it had done the same thing for Don Imus when his gums flapped a little to wide. More »

More about:  FCC MSNBC profanity Joe Scarborough Tiki Barber Jane Fonda


Other Crime & Courts Stories