Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

Meet the Incredible Shrinking President

Mar 23, 09 | 8:33 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
The president, having failed to seize the moment and offer a plausible solution to the economic crisis, has become part of the problem.

How do we restore confidence when what we’ve learned is that nobody has any credible basis on which to say he or she can be trusted to figure this thing out? Not Congress, not Wall Street, not the new White House—so far only marginally less clueless than the old White House.

The Congress that is now intent upon imposing regulation on executive compensation is, at least in substantial measure, the same Congress that failed to regulate before.

The guys on Wall Street, who miraculously still have their jobs, and who we are going to have to believe can do their jobs before we get confidence back, have become strange, furtive, grotesque figures—concerned only about holding onto their jobs, which surely they’re all about to lose.

The save-the-banks plan announced by the White House this morning has all the earmarks of the save-the-banks plans that have already failed.


(AP Image)


There’s no voice anywhere that clearly distinguishes itself from the others. Rather, there continues to be the sense of all these failures, these discredited people and institutions, huddled together. Nobody wants to get too far afield from everybody else, except if the press gets too bad. Then, everybody’s pointing fingers at everybody else.

The president’s brilliant opportunity was to be utterly new and apart and therefore in a position to say the unexpected and the original and offer a counter logic and counter proposal. But he got scared, or suckered, or came face-to-face with the fact that he, too, has no idea which end is up. Compounding the problem, he then went and hired the same old people who caused the problem.

The morons in Washington, along with the big swinging dicks on Wall Street, have consistently demonstrated how in-over-their-heads they are. It’s the rank distrust of everybody involved that has most of all undermined basic confidence. The Obama people, in quite an amazingly short time, have made themselves indistinguishable from everybody involved. The president has missed the point: Nothing happens if confidence isn’t restored (confidence is the belief that confidence will be restored) and confidence can only be restored by confidence. That was the president’s job. To give us some backbone, boldness, brashness, some certainty, courage, and daring—instead of becoming part of this peculiarly Washington-type effort to express confidence in the people and notions and systems in which everybody has lost confidence.

The president is sinking into this swamp. Disappearing before our eyes.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com

11 comments
VIEWING:
 
gianpaul
Mar 23, 09 11:09 AM CDT
At the beginning of the end of the Roman Empire (Nero, disaster in Pompeii) what should have saved the Romans then was "panem et circenses". Bread and divertissments: Here we now have Bernanke/Geithner throwing what money they can at the banks etc. and your Potus serving the divertissment part of their "strategy". Appearing at Leno's night show, soon one can expect to see Ofra/Obama, Letterman/Obama, Larry King/ Obama.While your Chinese financiers are watching... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
polstroad
Mar 23, 09 12:31 PM CDT
I can accept just about everything said here. But one question: WHAT IS IT YOU WOULD DO THAT WOULD MAKE EVERYTHING WORK JUST RIGHT? Typically, you badmouth but offer no corrective...easy game to play. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
oheart55
Mar 23, 09 1:06 PM CDT
"I want it done and I want it right now, or I'm gonna throw a temper tantrum," said the pouting child; Mr. Wolff, talk about knee-jerk journalism! Eight (or more) years to get into this mess and, what, three months to get out...get a life! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Rob
Mar 23, 09 1:17 PM CDT
Well maybe but its the same democratic congress that did so much damage over the past few years that we are trusting to get us out. It's not logical. They need to be replaced and fast.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
lefthem
Mar 23, 09 4:25 PM CDT
The problem is new and complex. By now, a year into this, many people actually know what got us here, but noone knows definitively how to get us out (although seemingly Mr. Wolff knows who doesn't know how to get us out). Cato Institute economists are calling for fiscal discipline, libertarians are calling for letting the banks fail and letting the chips fall where they may, and new Keynesians are calling for multi-trillion dollar spending plans. And these are all presumably smart people whose focus is economics. What we do know is that anyone with a clue, from Buffet to Paulson to Volker onward, indicates that there are no good options - every path requires us to hold our noses. Like treating cancer all paths are horrible, except for the potential alternatives. What doesn't help is having economically ignorant people shouting their sophomoric criticisms into their megaphones without having anything constructive to offer. Yes, it sounds nice to say the President should be bold, except that whatever happens needs to work, not just be "outside the box". Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
owl
Mar 23, 09 5:10 PM CDT
After reading this post, I went back and looked at past entries in my Off the Grid RSS feed to see if they're all this bad. Thanks, Michael Wolff, for leading me to realize that your blog doesn't offer much worth reading. *Unsubscribe Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
DeniseVB
Mar 23, 09 5:32 PM CDT
Even Krugman thinks the save the banks plan will fail. Indeed, these are scary times....I don't trust any of them either. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Lawless1
Mar 23, 09 5:46 PM CDT
As a newcomer to Newser, I just went back to view a few of your recent essays...kudos, Michael! It's quite surprising to see someone connected with Vanity Fair offer anything less than a glowing opinion of our "Incredible Shrinking President". It's become so embarrassing - and frightening - that even the so-called "Liberal journals" are writing about how clueless he is. Thanks for the honest assesment of a disaster in progress. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
reality
Mar 23, 09 8:11 PM CDT
"Yes we can!" "It's time for change" "No more politics as usual" "A new direction" Reform reform reform reform. All these things and a lot more promised during the campaign gave a lot of people hope and of course the expectation that he would actually step up and be a leader and force congress to do their jobs and come up with the best possible solutions to the problems facing our nation. These hopes are squashed forever by Obama's proving to be nothing more than party politics as usual. A true leader cannot simply allow his own party to "have their way" with government. Neither party has ALL the right answers or all the wrong answers. The best solutions come from hard work and negotiations and getting the best ideas out of each member culminating in optimum solutions. simply letting one party have their way and do whatever they want on a whim does not produce optimum results. A leader would have to stand up to his own party and actually put America ahead of his party for this to ever work. It has not happened in recent history. And yes, Obama led us to believe he might be the one thus making him larger than life. His lousy failure to deliver anything other than whatever Reid/Pelosi tells him to do has resulted in exactly what the author puts forth. Shrinkage....at so many levels. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
BitterClinging
Mar 24, 09 12:34 AM CDT
Voting numbers for Barack Obama's Historic Elecion: ***Hillary Clinton Earned more Votes than any Presidential Primary candidate in history. Barack Obama won by 4 Pledged Delegates that he received in the Caucus Voting States where "Estimates" were used. 2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY VOTING STATES: from Peniel Cronin "Primary versus Caucus" 2008 http://www.lynettelong.com/CAUCUSFRAUD/ 39 Primaries (State Run, State Financed) 34,863,326 Votes Cast -97% of the total Votes cast 17,673,679 Votes - 50.7% Hillary Clinton - 1555 Pledged Delegates 17,189,647 Votes - 49.3% Barack Obama - 1416 Pledged Delegates Hillary Clinton:+ 484,032 Votes (+1.4%) and 139 Pedged Delegates All Votes Abroad 10,070 Votes and 7 Pledged Delegates - Hillary Clinton 19,371 Votes and 10 Pledged Delegates - Barack Obama 13 Caucuses + Texas (Party Run, Party Financed) 1,057,136 Votes Cast -2.9% of the total Votes cast -558,030 of these Votes (53%) were estimated by the Democratic Party 378,684 Estimated Votes - 35.8% Hillary Clinton - 172 Delegates 678,452 Estimated Votes - 64.2% Barack Obama - 312 Delegates Barack Obama + 299,768 Estimated Votes (+28.4%) and 140 Pledged Delegates Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
polstroad
Mar 24, 09 9:58 AM CDT
I have read all the comments. Now review all the "positive" ones, that is, those that agree with Michael and badmouth the president. How easy it is to call names. What, then, do these oh so sophisticated people offer us as a solution? Put McCain in place and all will be ok? name calling is for grade school Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS