Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Apr 22, 09 | 9:38 AM

Why Do Liberals Still Care About Matt Drudge?

Share
The New Republic, continuing the political world’s odd obsession with the Drudge Report, says its editor, Matt Drudge, has disappeared, or gone into seclusion like some latter-day Howard Hughes.

I do not think Drudge has disappeared. I think he is dead. Certainly the Drudge Report, which the New Republic claims gets “20 million hits per day” (a meaningless locution as old-fashioned as the Drudge Report itself) has been on automatic pilot for several years.
 
If he is not dead, he is definitely brain dead. There hasn’t been a breaking story on the site in months. Drudge, once one of the most vaunted gossips in the nation, clearly isn’t in the loop. Or he is just bored to death. He had been doing this for a decade. It is the same old Drudge Report, without improvement or variation. Or staff. Drudge may have theoretically gotten rich (“sources believe he makes millions per year off his site,” says the New Republic breathlessly, although Compete.com reports his traffic at 2.6 million visitors a month, which certainly isn’t going to make him millions), but he hasn’t built a business—it’s him alone performing the same repetitive act. (Or him and one Andrew Breitbart, a conservative blogger who seems to help him, and who has a site Drudge links to—and who exists only as an odd Drudge appendage; certainly nobody else seems to link to him.)

(Getty Images)
So why does anybody care? The New Republic article goes on at enormous length to make Drudge out to be tremendously powerful and influential, using that popular and specious measure—“read religiously by Washington's reporters, political operatives, and cable news producers.”
 
The Drudge prominence, at least in the mind of the New Republic, probably has to do with his alleged relationship with other high media profile conservatives, like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. Drudge, in other words, is a member of the Right Wing Media Conspiracy. He’s a great specter—all the more so because of his weirdness and secrecy. Oh, and his gayness—to hide from the press is one reason the New Republic believes he’s disappeared. It may be that the liberal press is going to try to keep these right-wingers relevant for as long as possible—that liberals can’t be liberal without bogeymen.
 
But it’s nonsense. Drudge doesn’t count for anything. He’s from another time—a leftover. In fact, his disappearance might just be a mid-life crisis. The New Republic has missed the story. But in a comment posted to the story—one that’s in fact far more informative than the story itself, as happens more and more in the new world of Internet comments and journalism—we get the truer picture:
 
“In his day—which is now, clearly eclipsed (there's a moldy, whole "Who cares?" quality about this piece) Matt Drudge, reflected us back to us. We needed to "know"—and he was the shiv, the dumpster diving closet case who'd do ANYTHING to gratify that need.”

The New Republic piece does tellingly point out that Drudge has been missing for 2 years
—and apparently no one noticed.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

19 comments
VIEWING:
 
Robert_Dada
Apr 22, 09 6:36 PM CDT
He was, and always will be, a complete and total ass. A Fedora alone does not make you a hard boiled gumshoe detective. For one, you need intelligence and instinct. Drudge had neither, which is why he faded from view and no one gave a piss to even notice. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader3181
Apr 22, 09 9:23 PM CDT
I don't think anyone much cares if he has faded into marginality. The hacks went with this silly angle, and it got lots of pick-up. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68461134
Apr 22, 09 9:31 PM CDT
Drudge is my first stop for what is happening in the world. If I want slanted crap or more globalwarminmongering hysteria I will check out HuffPo. As for how many check his site, I would put it closer to 20 M than 2Million. By the way, Kaus spanks you good. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Zorro
Apr 22, 09 10:33 PM CDT
Mr. Wolff is right - according to Compete.com Drudge has less than 3M visitors, but what he missed is that (also per Compete.com) those 3M visitors go to the site frequently - generating over 40M visits per month - with those numbers Drudge does have very loyal followers that make millions for him. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader67491510
Apr 22, 09 10:52 PM CDT
The "New Republic's odd obsession" with Drudge seems no more odd than your obsession with the New York Times, now does it? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68479999
Apr 22, 09 11:03 PM CDT
Are there any facts in this piece? What are you reporting? I hoped to learn something... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68542260
Apr 23, 09 8:49 AM CDT
3 million visitors per day? That's a bigger audience than Maddow at MSNBC. She gets a little over 1 million. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Zorro
Apr 23, 09 11:44 AM CDT
3 million per month.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68552098
Apr 23, 09 9:59 AM CDT
He is also gay. He comes across as a guy who was picked on in high school and this is his way of getting back at people even his own "kind". Shame on him for his intolerance of other gays. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
mlbonk
Apr 24, 09 9:20 AM CDT
He is also gay. ================= SO WHAT!!!!!
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68564280
Apr 23, 09 10:25 AM CDT
Obviously Mr. Wolff has agenda by writing this article. He still thinks the NYT is relevant Perhaps he has the warms for Mr. Olbermann. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68560318
Apr 23, 09 10:42 AM CDT
Liberals always obsess over any conservative hold. Look at their odd obsession with Fox News, talk radio and the Washington Times. Sure, they have EVERYTHING else, but they have to attack those outlets extensively. Besides, Drudge really isn't that effectively conservative, his website is merely links to other news, and his site was relatively kind to Obama. He rarely breaks news, but he really hasn't in a long time. The tizzy just exists because liberals don't think conservatives have a right to air their views. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Cax
Apr 23, 09 12:09 PM CDT
I do not care for the bias and the half-truths of the content. But I love the easy to read format. If I see something posted - I just know to look for the details else where. I just wish a more rounded/ better informed site would have a similar layout. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68632490
Apr 23, 09 2:32 PM CDT
It sure sounds like Michael Wolf has a severe case of penis envy when it comes to Matt Drudge... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68632490
Apr 23, 09 3:02 PM CDT
It sure sounds like Michael Wolff has a severe case of penis envy... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader68657611
Apr 23, 09 4:30 PM CDT
Are there ANY media folks right of Lenin that haven't been attacked by these insecure morons? The Sorros puppet won, and they are still afraid of competition of thought. Wow.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
dcalyn
Apr 24, 09 6:42 AM CDT
"Drudge, in other words, is a member of the Right Wing Media Conspiracy.", OMG is this guy serious? What an insecure and paranoid Lib. Get with the program there is no Right Wing Conspiracy; we just have a voice and a brain rather than just a whim and a feeling. The above article is not journalism; it’s an unadulterated Liberal agenda. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
DrudgeReport
Apr 26, 09 12:15 AM CDT
Our true traffic statistics are much higher than that reported yb both Alexa and Compete.com. We also have more than one website, including our newest addition http://drudge-report.org, where you can get the new Drudge Report toolbar for your web browser. Toolbars in fact are behind the numbers used by both Alexa and Compete.com and only indicates a small sampling of usage by those using a toolbar that tracks where visitors go on the web. I am not now or ever have been in hiding. We may not have changed our format in many years, but that is because it is a format that works. We can't please everyone, and we're not trying to. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
WisdomWorld
Apr 26, 09 11:55 PM CDT
"Drudge doesn’t count for anything." Kind of like...another reporter...who is he...oh yeah. You. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS