Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

What’s So Bad About Steven Rattner?

Apr 27, 09 | 8:22 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
I’ve been writing about Steve Rattner pretty steadily for five or six years. He’s been one of my favorite characters from the age of financial ambition. He’s often been angry and hurt about what I’ve had to say. But, honestly, I never disliked him. Rather, I found him almost too good.
 
He was a striver without respite. I myself might have liked to have striven as hard, but tired too easily. Rattner, on the other hand, was indefatigable. He amassed it all. The money, the Manhattan apartment (what an apartment!), the tireless wife, great power and influence among everybody else of power and influence. True, his chase didn’t ever seem to end, or his exertions to get him what he wanted. Instead of being Treasury Secretary, he's only the Car Czar (even there he was really only head of the Car Czar committee).
 
And now, instead of getting an ultimate reward for his constant exertion, it looks like he’s going to be punished for it. His dedication to doing everything that was necessary to reach the top, and to accomplishing and surpassing what was expected of him (once, when I wrote about him, his father responded with a rancorous defense of his son—you know there’s a lot riding on success in that house) has gotten him into terrible trouble.
 
(Tony Bennett and Steve Rattner, Getty)
What he did was what you had to do to raise money—the money with which he was building the investment firm that gave him wealth and power.
 
Now I have, in a small time sort of way, tried to be like Steve Rattner and have tried to raise money myself. In my experience there may not be anything, even in the boom years, harder to do. People just don’t want to give you their dough. Or they want you to really get on your knees for it. (Unless they believe they’ll get more dough back from you, and then they’ll get on their knees in front of you—but, in Rattner’s case, his investment fund wasn’t ever that successful.) Every such transaction involves an added little something. Understanding this is no doubt the secret sauce for getting rich. I will give you something and you will give me something. We will all scratch each other’s backs. It may always have been so (and always will be).
 
Steve Rattner accommodated the middle man for some of New York State’s pension funds. Or, less generously, he paid off the bag man. He did this, I believe, because this was how the game was played. If you wanted to be Steven Rattner, this was the price.
 
There’s now much tisk-tisking about hubris and tragic flaws. But that, I’d argue, is pumped up. We are now trying to imbue the go-go years (dreadful now, but soon we will remember them as a wondrous time) with great cautionary tales. When, in reality, Steve’s dealings were merely business as usual.
 
His tragedy is just that he was a little too proud of being a striver, and a success; if he was guilty of anything, it was of wanting people to know it.
 
The lesson we learn is that nobody likes a hotdog.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

5 comments
VIEWING:
 
johnodod
Apr 27, 09 10:04 AM CDT
There can be no political corruption without someone willing to pay bribes. Blago wasn't crazy, he knew there were people who would pay. People like Rattner, who will get off on the plausible claim that he didn't know what was going on. Unless the middlemen flip on him, and even if they do they're oily and corrupt, Rattner will be defended by the White House. After all Obama used a political buddy now rotting in jail as a convicted felon, (Tony Rezko) to help buy his house. Rattner is like Obama, he used bad judgement, because to acknowledge the obvious corruption is to harmful to the ediface that has been constructed. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
JBTipton
Apr 27, 09 11:22 AM CDT
About 150 years ago, Balzac wrote, "Behind every great fortune lies a crime." Had he said "nearly every" it would have been more accurate, but less elegant. However, the more quickly the fortune is made, the more likely the statement is to be true. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
NewserFan
Apr 27, 09 5:58 PM CDT
There is interesting background on Steve Rattner in the excellent William Cohan book "The Last Tycoons" (history of Lazard investment bank). Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Reader3181
Apr 28, 09 7:22 AM CDT
Your portrait of Ratner in "Autumn of the Moguls" was hilarious. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
MeMayer
Apr 28, 09 2:42 PM CDT
Answer: Nothing? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS