Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

The Swine Flu Crisis Is Now Over—or Will Be

May 1, 09 | 7:53 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
As the WHO raises its warning to just this side of official pandemic, and Joe Biden tells his family to avoid confined spaces, the backlash is also setting in. The LA Times reports that scientists are already beginning to relax and that the swine flu (aka H1N1) may be a lot less menacing than the plain old flu. And the pork industry is striking back, worrying that it will become as tainted as, well, Mexico.

There is, too, an overnight growth in swine conspiracy theories: e.g. Mexican drug cartels and al-Qaeda have combined their vaunted scientific expertise to manufacture the virus.

The conspiracy theories might better be directed at the hysteria rather than the virus. Who, in other words, is responsible for the outbreak of alarm and panic and media exhortations?

Who, in addition to relentless and shameless cable networks, would be WHO, which has been taking a "when, not if" view of the inevitability of pandemics for some time. WHO has been arguing that, given levels of worldwide travel, infectious diseases will spread faster and wider. The problem with this argument is that, in 50 years of mass travel, infectious diseases have decreased. What’s more, infectious disease spread fast and wide well before airplanes transported them.


(AP Photo)

The threat of a modern flu pandemic uses 1918 as the benchmark and, by implication, equates pandemic with the worldwide death of millions. Philip Alcabes, the author of Dread: How Fear and Fantasy Have Fueled Epidemics From the Black Death to Avian Flu, pointed out a month ago in the Washington Post that there have only been two flu pandemics since 1918—one in 1957, one in 1968, with, in both cases, deaths being no greater in the US than from ordinary seasonal flu. That, in itself, is of course not nothing—if you attach the word pandemic to the 20,000-30,000 yearly flu deaths, ordinary levels of mortality start to feel like a crisis.

The media brouhaha perhaps comes from good intentions: If the world is put on guard people will avoid confined spaces and governments will jump into action. Alcabes points out, however, that a swine flu scare in 1976, in which one solider died, spiraled into crisis warnings and resulted in an initiative wherein 45 million Americans were vaccinated, causing, in turn, an outbreak of Guillain-Barr syndrome, which cost the government million of dollars in wrongful death claims—with no ensuing swine flu epidemic.

Not surprisingly, the panic, or idea that there should be a panic, is tied to borders (Joe Biden wants his family to stay out of confined places, but has taken the administration’s line opposing the right wing’s call to close our border with Mexico) and immigration. The panic began not because of the people in Mexico who are getting swine flu, but from the fact that last week two children in California were discovered to have it.

But then, before you know it, it passes. Not because we took precautions, and stayed out of confined spaces, but because it turned out to be everyday life rather than the end of it.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

8 comments
VIEWING:
 
yourfaithfulreporter
May 1, 09 12:59 PM CDT
Acutely observed, Michael... Not that there's anything wrong with 'everyday life', of course... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Parvus
May 1, 09 3:47 PM CDT
yes, because you happen to be more than well acquainted with the complex mathematical models that predict starker outcomes than those of past pandemics (in the presence of an extremely dangerous pathogenic agent). Your opinion trumps the hard work of geniuses, a consortium of computer scientists, mathematicians, virologists and epidemiologists... oh, and the diminishing prevalence of massively destructive off-season infectious diseases can't be due to the improved prophylaxis of present social agglomerations and their health-procuring infrastructures, the creation of cures and vaccines, and the momentary stagnation of antigenic shift; it's, as you seem to believe, because they're gone forever... we're too cool for extinction now LOL... truly threatening human pandemics have been gone for like 30 years... do you know what that is in evolutionary time???? nothing... and in this case, because viruses can evolve very rapidly (and efficiently due to all the new environmental pressures), and because we are immunologically naïve to new ones (of animal origin), all the quarantines, disinfectants , anti-viral treatments and vaccine research won't sum up to anything significant... this has only been a brief hiatus...pick up a basic biology book, man, geez! the dominating factors in contagion scenarios have always been the mixing of populations and the density of populations; all you need is the right virus or bacterium. peace. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
2-bits
May 1, 09 3:58 PM CDT
Precisely what I was thinking.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Judith.Baumel
May 1, 09 9:03 PM CDT
Thanks, Michael, for this really smart argument. World-wide, (including) Mexico, there have been relatively few deaths. We are not in a health crisis. Glad you mentioned *Dread.* It's got a solid argument about how the human need for a disaster narrative overwhelms our ability to sort through facts. Alcabes puts this in perspective on his blog http://www.philipalcabes.com Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Parvus
May 1, 09 11:45 PM CDT
the so-called "disaster narrative" might be a common theme in decadent societies. reverberations of what lord clark once said, and i paraphrase: declining civilizations will succumb to an ecstatic fear of the apocalypse and feel disappointed when their prophesies of blazing destruction fail to materialize. that's all very true but it does not, nor does it attempt to, dispel the scientific fact that "evolution is the exception, extinction is the rule"... we're a young species, and quite a resourceful one, but we seem to be manufacturing the perfect set of conditions for an infectious disease to give us the "coup de grace" early in the game, and send us straight into the fossil record. and if an alien civilization were to ever study our remains to try to determine our downfall, death by influenza won't sound as far fetched as you'd think. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
Grahame
May 2, 09 1:47 AM CDT
The article suffers from several flaws. Presently the H5N1 strain does not have many victims however this does not mean that it is a minor problem. The virus is a novel strain and will likely mutate into a much more virulent strain. The more 'garden variety' mentioned in the article flu has a lower mortality rate and is fatal almost exclusively to the elderly and those already in poor physical health. The argument that modern day mass travel does not increase the speed with which diseases can spread is not valid. Firstly the counterargument that infectious diseases have decreased whilst modern travel has increased suffers from a causality problem. The real reason of course is an increase in technology, medicine, medical research, improvements in public health policies etc.. In addition all as far as I can see all reported cases bar one (in Spain) have resulted from people who have recently travelled to Mexico. In light of the this how does the statement that "infectious disease spread fast and wide well before airplanes transported them." make any sense? I certainly do not agree we should overstate the risks seeing as the probability of a full blown pandemic on the scale of 1918, 57, 68 is low, however to claim the flu is "now over or nearly will be" is premature. This is a low probabilty, potentially high impact event and should be afforded our respect and caution accordingly. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
mara_46
May 2, 09 9:11 AM CDT
We must not let our guard down. We are up against a disease than can potentially kill. I t could lay dormant and than raise it s ugly head when we least expect it and wipe out thousands of the human poulation, It is stronger than we are. We must not engage in unhealthy unhygenic activities. Remember our loved ones and help to preserve whatever time we have left on this earth. Be safe. May God be with us all. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader73806101
May 2, 09 7:19 PM CDT
I say that everyone that is becoming overly obssesed with the topic of Swine, DON'T BE! Take your precautions, wash your hand, stay away from sick people. (We should have been doing that all along anyways) This monster that WE HAVE CREATED called MEDIA has a way of affecting us all. TURN OFF YOUR T.V. go and enjoy the sun and breath fresh air. This time on this earth is not very long, and to stress and put energy into something that is really OUT OF OUR CONTROL or maybe simply not even TRUE is a waste of time. REBEL and don't let the media determine our levels of stress, they've been doing it for too long....don't you think????? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS