Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Jun 24, 09 | 9:09 AM

Steve Jobs Lives (or Is Not Dead, Apparently)

Share
Well, is he in the building or not? Is he all better? Why won’t they tell us? And does it matter?

Now, it very well may be that many successful public companies are run by crazy buggers—secretive, paranoid, and contrary to a fantastic degree. It may be that Steve Jobs is actually a breath of fresh air. While he may have tried to hide his health issues, he’s certainly open about his peculiarities.

Anyway, he very well could be back at work, and, according to mysterious sources, with a new liver (a hospital in Memphis is now claiming to have supplied it). Indeed, in Jobs’ continuing campaign to turn corporate transparency on its ear, various members of the press seem to have been told certain things under certain conditions designed to further cloud the situation. Not just to turn transparency on its ear, but to mock it.

At virtually every step of Jobs’ illness there’s been a pattern of misinformation and subterfuge and pretense and prevarication. And for what? None of this obfuscation seems to have been to any clear point. There certainly doesn’t seem to be a business advantage to this grand deception. The point seems to be just deception itself—how much can Steve Jobs get away with? And even here, it’s a little odd because what has been most clear is Jobs’ intent to deceive everybody. Perhaps this is what has helped the company avoid the kind of SEC scrutiny that such deception at such a grand scale at a public company would seem to deserve—that is, it’s hard to accuse a company of hiding material facts when it’s obvious what material facts it’s hiding. In other words, it isn’t so much an intention to deceive, rather it’s just weirdness and eccentricity, and there aren’t SEC rules against that.


(AP Photo)

So perhaps it’s time to look at the way Steve Jobs has handled his illness, not from an uptight regulatory and shareholder view, but from a more heroic angle. The way he has handled his illness has been a calculated fuck you to compliance ritual and propriety and to every investor and geek and subscriber to Silicon Valley mythology who thought they had a claim on him. If he was going to die, he was going to die his way. If he was not going to die, perhaps his way was what was going to keep him alive.

Or, if he was going to die, then he was going to make it as difficult and as stressful as possible for everyone around him. Or, if he wasn’t going to die, he was going to do it in such a way that he’d be able to say one helluva I-told-you-so.

Genius has its privileges and he was going to take advantage of all of them. Anyway, if he did have to die, he certainly wasn’t going to be generous or gracious about it. And, of course, maybe he still is dying and this being in the building and back at work is just a terrible tease—the final fuck you.

Somewhere in this weirdness there are probably secrets about what makes certain businesses uniquely great. Jobs, however, is still a prick.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
EmilyWSussman
Jun 24, 09 11:56 AM CDT
Hi Michael. Your column is great.( And the site, obvs.) Thanks. EWS Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader3181
Jun 24, 09 3:17 PM CDT
This is very smart. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Deebles
Jun 24, 09 3:45 PM CDT
What a great point: pointless fabrication as the new transparency; I'm very intrigued by the SEC angle: why are all the lies about the Wall Street scandals putting the issue to bed rather than waking everybody up? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
lefthem
Jun 24, 09 5:16 PM CDT
He is a genius - he is a prick and he has contempt for the media. Everyone knows he's very sick - does it really change that much to know all the intimate details? Just let him be. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jun 25, 09 7:14 AM CDT
The curious thing is that if he really wanted to just be let be, he would have dealt with his heath matters in a much more straightforward and formal way. He's turned the situation into an opera or farce.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Bob_Dunn
Jun 27, 09 8:36 PM CDT
Maybe it's time to look at how Jobs managed to get a liver transplant so quickly when "regular" people go through hell before getting to the head of the transplant list or, as happened to someone very close to me, die before the medical bureaucracy even allows them a place on the list. Do the rich and powerful get cuts in the transplant lines? I'm betting they do. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS