Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Oct 29, 09 | 8:58 AM

How the Internet Got Lost and Why Google’s GPS Won’t Show Us the Way Out

Share
I had lunch yesterday with my old friend and former colleague, Chip Bayers, who, 15 years ago this week, after having left my fledgling Internet business in New York, helped start HotWired in San Francisco. This is significant because advertising on the Internet started with HotWired’s launch and because it started with the banner ad, invented by Wired’s editor and founder, Louis Rossetto, and because advertising on the Internet is still dominated by the banner ad, which has never worked all that well.

In fact, this very development which, 15 years ago, launched the Internet revolution is now threatening to stop it in its tracks. Or, anyway, the fact that, beyond search ads, lame excuses for advertising, there has been no meaningful development of Internet advertising forms, acumen, or performance.

I bring this up not just because of my pleasant lunch or because Internet CPMs (what we get paid for a thousand views) continue to fall through the floor, but because Google has announced a new free GPS system which you’ll be able to use on your phone. Google is saying that this nifty service, all the niftier because it is free, will probably be supported by an advertising model.

What we have here is a perfect example of the great Internet advertising paradigm: Make something nifty, make it free, get a lot of people to use it, and then sell some ads around it, although, because we are technology people, and have never seduced anybody, we really don’t know how to create effective advertising.

This is okay for Google, which figured out that it could make money even off of advertising that doesn’t work very well, because it was the only game in town. But it has been terrible for people trying to move merchandise, and even worse for everybody else on the Internet trying to exist off of what was left after Google took its cut of the ever-shrinking CPM pie.

In other words, 15 years after it all began here we are in an advertising-driven business in which no one has really figured out how to get the consumer’s attention and call him or her to action. I’d argue that they haven’t figured that out because they haven’t thought about it very much. Rather, they’re thinking about functionality—how to make the technology do quite amazing things—rather than about how to sell stuff.

In addition to not being people who have much interest in making an emotional connection, technology people, I believe, rather look down on the idea of advertising and its smooth-guy practices. Advertising people, for their part, know nothing about technology. So, if the technology people can’t get advertising to work because they don’t do salesmanship, ad people can’t get Internet advertising to work because they don’t do technology.

That, 15 years later, still stuck with the banner ad, is the fix we are in.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NewserColumns.
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
Snowleopard
Oct 29, 09 12:29 PM CDT
An excessive amount of venture capital has distorted the 'marketplace' of the internet, by creating an extreme glut in the supply of services (media/blogs/news/etc), that have no business model because they're leaching off rich investors. This glut of competition has dilluted the potential income for everyone, and driven potential revenue to zero. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Snowleopard
Oct 29, 09 12:31 PM CDT
Companies like facebook can continue to offer their services for free because of the charity of their investors, even though in a normal business environment they would have declared bankruptcy a long time ago.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Nov 2, 09 9:20 PM CST
How odd, because to me the simple solution is to do what you do--pair adds with the filleted-to-the-bone info on the home page. The only two times that my comments didn't get posted is when I read the add and commented on the add. I see the synergy in the add and the parsed bit, but I get no joy from tying them together. Rupert would be all over my reading the adds and using them in the aggregate. Capitalism--the apt worm.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
bewilderbeast
Nov 9, 09 5:22 AM CST
Is it not that we fail to appreciate how many successful "old type" businesses operate off manipulative, exclusive (in the sense many are excluded from taking part) systems, where most people are actively excluded from competing against the established players? Is the 'net not unusual, being real free enterprise existing on a level playing field? I'm saying: Blame the old system, not the new.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Snarfeh
Oct 29, 09 2:37 PM CDT
All advertisers have figured out how to do is to annoy me and cause me not to continue to a web page once I cannot get there prior to viewing an ad. I have never, ever continued to a page or web site that had a pop up block my progress. And I never will. There is always another web site that has what I was seeking. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
mlorenzo
Oct 29, 09 5:50 PM CDT
This is dumb, so you're against clicking to continue but not against scrolling. You have to scroll down past an ad to get to content anyway, and unless you have a wheel mouse you'll have to click to go down the page. Or worse, you'd have to use the keyboard. Somebody has to pay for the content to show up, does clicking really get in the way of it not being you who is paying?
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Snarfeh
Oct 31, 09 11:46 AM CDT
I'm not against clicking or scrolling. I'm against *waiting*....I'm against being barred from what I want to see by something I would rather *choose* to see or not see. All content does not have to be supported by advertising, but truly, as long as you and others like you are ok supporting it, thanks from me and others like me. Fuck intrusive advertising.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
bewilderbeast
Nov 9, 09 5:24 AM CST
Are you using Firefox rather than Internet Explorer. At least it helps.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
rottenpeter
Oct 29, 09 4:06 PM CDT
If old media is dead (your words) because advertising has moved to the Internet, and if advertising on the Internet isn't working, does this mean that the advertisers have lost business due to the migration of their communications to a less effective vehicle... Or does, if they didn't loose any significant business, does that mean that advertising in old media didn't work either (which I always suspected somehow)? We could be approaching a moment of truth here: Advertising doesn't work...period (except on TV). Imagine the ensuing media collapse if advertising proves to have been a bubble... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
mlorenzo
Oct 29, 09 5:51 PM CDT
no they lost and are losing business. you can find tons of articles pontificating on this problem in the trade publications. the trick advertisers have pulled is to convince marketers that they need to pay for another specialist, a digital specialist.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
janbee
Oct 30, 09 8:50 AM CDT
Michael, like most of us we become our fathers and whatever business your dad was in -- he no doubt experienced the same things. His son plays with the internet instead of finding a real job. Durng the first 15 years you had no problem building a business model and offering those same innocuous display ads, pop-ups, free advertiser "schwag" which none of us really need -- Now that rates are plummeting and as a business owner you are calling out Google? C'mon dude -- you made a killing b/c of them, and now you're bitchin'? The more things change the more they stay the same. The $-market for Internet advertising is imploding b/c large corporations are putting so much garbage out there -- the market is flooded. Simple supply and demand - and the internet has an endless supply for ad-space. This is just a market adjustment. OVER-SATURATION. If you want prices to go back up -- limit the space you have to advertise like the other mediums - print and traditional TV -- but the internet has no limit b/c of capitalism there is always someone willing to take your money -- You my dear man have become part of the problem and the solution. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
SAG
Oct 30, 09 2:09 PM CDT
@snowleopard makes such a good point. without massive VC funding or secondary revenue streams the internet would be a very different place. If GE offered free lightbulbs while it "tried to find a business model" and run all competitors out of business they would be heavily fined for anti-trust. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
The_Old_Wolf
Nov 4, 09 3:32 PM CST
I wrote this (http://ccdesan.livejournal.com/160407.html) just this morning, before I had read this outstanding article. We're definitely in a pickle. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader83547021
Nov 11, 09 2:08 PM CST
I'm working on letting people *sponsor* individual stories in bulk, through social networks. The difference from ads is that a sponsored download must exist, to allow free access. See http://www.replicounts.org Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS