Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
This is a phenomenon that just keeps giving.

Its very lack of explanation, and ensuing incredulity and apoplexy, propel it.

There may not have ever been anything like it in modern American politics. Well, Ronald Reagan perhaps. But his was, at least, a 20-year phenomenon. In little more than a year, Sarah Palin has gone from zero status to significant opposition leader, contender for the leadership of her party, and one of the most extraordinary media figures in the country.

It is hard to catch up with her. She moves too fast to study. Beside the expressions of incredulity and apoplexy, nobody in the media has been able to offer any satisfying rationale for her fantastic rise. Indeed, every analysis in essence explains why she should merely be a laughing stock, which, curiously, she is, even as her rise continues.

To my knowledge, there are at this point only two journalists even trying to uncover the basic operations of the Palin phenomenon.

Andrew Sullivan, the diligent blogger who, early on, became focused on the discrepancies in the Palin story—indeed, who sees an intricate conspiracy underlying her rise—announced yesterday his blog was going dark so he could give extra attention to Palin’s book, her latest phenomenological iteration. "There is a possibility here of such a huge scandal that we would be crazy not to take our time either to debunk it or move it forward for further examination," says Sullivan, who regularly loses his cool in his efforts to explain Palin.

Joe McGinniss (author of possibly the most seminal political book of the age, The Selling of the President) is the other reporter on the case. His book, Sarah Palin's Year of Living Dangerously, will be published by Broadway Books. But his early efforts to interest publishers in the Palin story met with "indifference to distatse."

McGinniss has feared that "Palin's own ghost-written" book would be "the only lasting record of one of the more amazing phenomenons in American cultural history,” he said in an email to me this summer.

There is, too, Nate Silver, at FiveThirtyEight.com, who has been looking at the phenomenon not so much in journalistic terms, but as a reflection of marketing nuance. The Palin operation involves, in his analysis, leveraging the power of a passionate audience, albeit a sliver audience, against the passionlessness and even aimlessness of the majority of the Republican Party. That’s what could make her, in Silver’s estimation, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012.

But this is scant attention being paid to the second most important political figure in the nation—and paltry understanding.

Anyway, the phenomenon grows larger and more inexplicable along with, and probably aided by, the laughter.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NewserColumns.
21 comments
VIEWING:
 
Tarantulas
Nov 19, 09 1:33 PM CST
After reading your first five sentences, I thought you were talking about ObamaMania. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
Read090923204783386
Nov 19, 09 1:39 PM CST
Great post - the title alone made me laugh out loud. I keep waiting for overexposure to kick in, yet it has not yet happened. After swearing off any more Palin news following the election, I found myself analyzing the PR playbook for a blog post. http://bit.ly/36Eg03 Love her or hate her, she is a media phenomenon. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
fancygapva
Nov 19, 09 2:41 PM CST
What's amazing is that respectable authors are analyzing her when it's obvious that she and her meth addicted inlaws, fashionably 5 o'clock shadowed husband and rowdy children and their progeny are National Enquirer material. Is this country addicted to authoritarian, greedy, ignorant, inflammatory and inarticulate politicians who know nothing about government, geography or history but everything about shallow marketing gimmickry? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
gianpaul
Nov 19, 09 2:58 PM CST
In this very blog/response column I said some 8-9 months ago (being an amateur astrologer) that Palin will be elected President in 2012. We are not there yet, but at least to me and who interprets her horoscope the way I do, "it's all written". So, if the phenomenon grows "larger and more inexplicable", a priviledged few may have an explanation. And thanks for your attention... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Nov 19, 09 3:10 PM CST
It's written. We're helpless to change outcomes. I think I'll just sleep off the next few decades...nothing I can do about it, huh?
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
QueenAlli
Nov 19, 09 9:10 PM CST
WTF are you two talking about?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Nov 21, 09 8:11 AM CST
@ Queen A--Gianpaul believes that our fate is sealed, it's in the stars. I just poked a little fun at his belief.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
schmidtkoff
Nov 27, 09 10:16 AM CST
hokus pokus gian - astrology? horoscopes? try HORRORscopes.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
pj4311
Nov 19, 09 3:02 PM CST
"Is this country addicted to authoritarian, greedy, ignorant, ...shallow marketing gimmickry?" Well it elected Obama didn't it? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-4
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Nov 19, 09 3:08 PM CST
Got examples of authoritarianism, greed, and ignorance in the Obama administration? I'll give you the shallow marketing gimmickry.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
gianpaul
Nov 19, 09 4:04 PM CST
And before Obama Bill Clinton...
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Nov 19, 09 8:40 PM CST
Examples of authoritarianism, greed and ignorance in the Obama and or Clinton administration? I could go with some greed in the Clinton administration but I'd welcome your examples of authoritarianism and ignorance in either. Republicans like dumb authoritarian presidents that can be manipulated by the Oligarchs that really run things but Democrats do tend to elect smart, articulate presidents.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
mlorenzo
Nov 19, 09 6:13 PM CST
Is part of the issue here, Michael, that any close examination of Palin makes one feel a bit dumb for giving her the respect of attention. This story, to me, feels closer to Anna Nicole's death than Watergate. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
ezzy4863
Nov 19, 09 6:23 PM CST
Americans are like sheep. One walks over a cliff they all go over a cliff. No rime or reason. You go over a cliff I guess thats the right thing.I guess boobs are a qualification for leading America Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Pragmaticrealism
Nov 19, 09 7:16 PM CST
The rise of this woman to pseudo-power mirrors the rise of the ignorant, in this country. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
GOP_4EVR
Nov 19, 09 7:18 PM CST
Wrong. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Snowleopard
Nov 21, 09 4:25 AM CST
i get the impression that michael wolf is posting as many articles on palin as he can, to increase her exposure, turning newser into his own political tool, ala rupert murdoch. i don't see this high a percentage of posts on palin anywhere else in the media. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
GlennH
Nov 22, 09 11:51 AM CST
I don't think it's that hard to understand. All major catastrophes attract a lot of attention. Palin is the political equivalent of a really destructive tornado. Who could ignore it? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
deezy
Nov 30, 09 10:47 PM CST
Great article buddy...no really...excellent work...top of the journalististic game ! Like dumb-dumb Palin needs any more pointless articles about her...you keep it going !! Maybe her "popularity" is the same as Bush's...proving that there are millions of dumb people who want a dumb leader...christ ENOUGH already Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Daddy-o
Dec 2, 09 7:34 PM CST
Palin is beautiful. Really beautiful, but has C- game at best and a distinct inability to think on her feet. My exposure to her shows her as a positional politician (common enough) but she can't explain why her positions are the right ones. I wish she'd get naked then go away. Terrible, ain't I? *wink* Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
ghhugh
Dec 3, 09 8:13 PM CST
When you look at the book crowds it makes you sad. The majority appear to be the disenfranchised of our society. Sarah talks their talk and strikes fear into them.She smiles when she signs their books that a majority will never read . A smiling Jesus grifter. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS