The New New York Times: Its Columnist Makes the Case for Ethnic Hegemony

Aug 17, 10 | 8:01 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Continued mockery of the New York Times’ Ross Douthat could get tiresome, but for now it’s irresistible. The entire genre of old fogey young guys who’ve become sputtering conservatives has not, I’d argue, been given its due. Perhaps, because the neocons have led us into war, we’ve been forced to take them seriously. What’s more, many of the neocons are old and wily, and capable of great political knife work, so had better be taken seriously.

But here’s this new generation. These are not just foolish young men, but caricatures—pants-pulled-up-too-high jokes, but for that they take themselves so seriously. (There are a surprising number of them—not Fox conservatives, but pretend-academic types. Bret Stephens at the Wall Street Journal is another bilious, and farcical, example.)

Douthat, after a year at the Times of writing like a church mouse, is finding his voice. It’s a ridiculous voice, tortured, ass-backwards, strangled, and often only semi-comprehensible (why do these people think they can be writers?), but so transparent in its rationalizations of conservative thought that it actually becomes quite vivid and compelling, in a train-wreck sort of way.

Last week, Douthat attempted to explain the conservative aversion to gay marriage. In a line I must continue to repeat—“…lifelong heterosexual monogamy at its best can offer something distinctive and remarkable—a microcosm of civilization, and an organic connection between human generations—that makes it worthy of distinctive recognition and support”—Douthat laid bare that the issue for conservatives in gay marriage is, most of all, an inability to talk about sex and human relationships.

Yesterday, it was a rationalization about Islam and immigration, in which Douthat, in an extraordinary first for the New York Times, proposes to set out a reasoned exposition of the principles of—no two ways about it—racism and other sorts of discrimination.

And damn if this isn’t, however polite, extraordinary explicit. There are, he posits, two kinds of Americans: one who subscribes to Democratic principles (I’m really not over-simplifying this) and another who elevates “culture” over political and constitutional norms. And he doesn’t mean opera.

These are, in the Douthat formulation, two hunky-dory sides of the American coin. On the one hand, there are the idealists—who make, in Douthat’s version of derision, “the finer-sounding speeches” (with specific reference to the president’s speeches)—and on the other, the “cruder, more xenophobic” Americans, who Douthat wants us to appreciate.

Say, what? “Cruder, more xenophobic?” Has anyone, ever, in the New York Times, defended the crudeness and xenophobia of America?

This is, in 31-year-old Douthat’s vision of the nation, the sensibility that makes things work, that tames idealism into practicality, that forges the American consensus. For instance: “Nativist concerns about Catholicism’s illiberal tendencies”—such nativists would be, prominently, the Ku Klux Klan —“inspired American Catholics to prod their church toward a recognition of the virtues of democracy.” Is there another way to read this: bigotry, by frightening people into conformity, creates consensus?

Perhaps if Douthat weren’t such a namby-pamby writer of such tortured syntax, Times readers might understand that the paper seems to have no idea what it’s printing anymore or what it stands for.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at You can also follow him on Twitter: @MichaelWolffNYC.
You need to Log in to Newser to comment. Don't have an account yet? Sign up now!
Oct 20, 10 | 1:52 PM

I Have an Afghanistan Solution

Oct 19, 10 | 9:28 AM

The War in Afghanistan Is Over

Oct 14, 10 | 10:22 AM

How to Tax the Rich

Oct 6, 10 | 8:54 AM

Founding Fathers Version 2.0

Sep 30, 10 | 11:40 AM

Here's Why Google Needs To Buy Twitter Immediately


OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.