Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Think You're Pretty Hot? You're Probably Wrong Study finds we have inflated vision of ourselves »

Scientists Slash Number of World's Plants by 600,000

Turns out that many plants have multiple names—some have hundreds

By Drew Nelles,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 20, 2010 10:55 AM CDT

(Newser) – A comprehensive scientific study will trim some 600,000 duplicates from the world’s list of flowering plants, the Guardian reports. After centuries of scientists naming “new” plants that had already been discovered, we currently count the number of plant species at about 1 million—but a more realistic number is 400,000, a joint American-British study team says.

"On average, one plant might have between two and three names,” a project partner says, which makes research difficult. And useful plants tend to have more names—the tomato has 790, and the oak 600. The researchers found that by searching for only one name of common plants, scientists sometimes missed out on 80% of available literature. The project will determine an accepted common name for each species and list its variations.

Common tiger butterflies visit flowers in bloom at the Presidential Palace in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2010.
Common tiger butterflies visit flowers in bloom at the Presidential Palace in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2010.   (AP Photo/Gurinder Osan)
A bee collects nectar from a flower on Wednesday, Sep. 8, 2010, in Lofer in the Austrian province of Salzburg..
A bee collects nectar from a flower on Wednesday, Sep. 8, 2010, in Lofer in the Austrian province of Salzburg..   (AP Photo/Kerstin Joensson)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
11%
18%
6%
56%
3%
6%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
schmidtkoff
Sep 20, 2010 2:39 PM CDT
hey i say good for the botanists. it's a thankless job but someone has to do it. better to have an accurate account. at first read i thought, "oh no, 600,00 plants had gone extinct." thank the powers that be. not yet at least, but maybe getting close. extinction is a real and dreadful and depressing thought and threat. i think of the little brown bat, the honey bee, the fireflies (lightning bug), even the vanishing butterflies. all of these depleted species have an impact on us and our environment. it does not bode well. no, you will not notice an immediate disruption in your daily life or the food chain hierarchy. but trust me, it will make a profound difference in life as we know it in the future. maybe not our future but in our kids, grandkids and their kids. you cannot break a link in the chain of life and expect life to go on as usual once that link in the chain has broken.
JoeQ
Sep 20, 2010 2:35 PM CDT
Well, that sounds like a good idea - a standard common name for each plant species. It's something that should have been done a long time ago, centuries even. Otherwise it would be like each country's astronomers had different names for the stars in the sky. While they do that, how about finally writing decent plant keys that can be used by your average folk - without degrees in botany. The Peterson guides were very successful, but they are sort of useless at identifying a specific plant or tree you run across, unless you get lucky.
JesusLovesSomeOfYou
Sep 20, 2010 12:17 PM CDT
That sounds like a horrible job.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne