Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Judge: Pimping, Opening Brothels A-OK in Canada

She guts main rules against prostitution

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 29, 2010 2:12 PM CDT

(Newser) – A judge in Canada has struck down the main laws against prostitution, which the Toronto Globe and Mail describes as a landmark ruling that could quickly become law of the land. Declaring that the current laws endanger prostitutes by forcing them to conduct business in iffy locales, the Ontario judge decriminalized three major ones: Openly soliciting customers, pimping, and operating a brothel. (Prostitution itself is legal in Canada, but those laws made most aspects of it off-limits, explains the AP.)

The government may appeal, but the forceful ruling suggests a tough fight. “By increasing the risk of harm to street prostitutes, the communicating law is simply too high a price to pay for the alleviation of social nuisance,” said the female judge. “I find that the danger faced by prostitutes greatly outweighs any harm which may be faced by the public.” All of which resulted in this quote from a dominatrix on the winning team: “I’m going to spank some ass. Legally!"

A file photo of a prostitute waiting for a customer.
A file photo of a prostitute waiting for a customer.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
12%
13%
3%
64%
5%
4%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 6 comments
Nwambe
Sep 29, 2010 4:30 PM CDT
Okay, first, the writer of this article, Mr. John Johnson, has unfortunately made a number of mistakes First, the judge has declared the laws against prostitution unconstitutional, she has NOT struck them down, nor implied that they will BECOME law of the land. Second, at no point did the judge agree that 'pimping' and 'opening brothels' is "A-OK". She has simply declared that the rules governing what legally constitutes a 'bawdy house' are too broad, and are thus unconstitutional. There was a legal case here some years ago of a dominatrix who offered her services in-home, but performed no sexual acts at all, convicted of being a prostitute. The judge in question has given both the government and the plaintiff approximately 30-60 days to offer submissions on how to proceed from this point. It would do the Newser Staff writer well to avoid such inflammatory language in the future, and conduct a little more research into the topic itself. This is an aggravating example of too little research and too much rhetoric.
OWLWOMANXXXX
Sep 29, 2010 2:33 PM CDT
I agree....more supervision of clients and girls will make it a lot safer for both . Pimps and madames need to be scrutinized too....to make sure that the girls are not being taken advantage of....like a Union of sorts...plus it will allow for more medical attention ,helping to stop VD and such
Fascist_Jack
Sep 29, 2010 2:15 PM CDT
Wise decision. Laws against prostitution only dis-empower, and therefore endanger prostitutes. Prostitution itself can never be eliminated. Lots of economically depressed states here in the USA could turn their whole economies around if they legalized prostitution.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne