Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Bailout May End Up Costing $0

Despised TARP expires Sunday

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 1, 2010 3:51 AM CDT | Updated Oct 1, 2010 7:39 AM CDT

(Newser) – The terms "$700 billion" and "bailout" are paired as often as "Tea" and "Party," but it turns out that the government lifeline to banks and auto firms will only cost taxpayers a fraction of what was originally predicted. The hugely unpopular Troubled Asset Relief Program—TARP—expires on Sunday, and Treasury officials say the program will cost the government $50 billion at most—and possibly nothing. AIG , the largest beneficiary, yesterday announced a plan to start paying the government back.

No matter how successful TARP looks now, however, it remains despised by the public and there won't be any politicians bragging about it on the campaign trail, the New York Times notes. Veteran Sen. Robert F. Bennett of Utah—dubbed "Bailout Bob" by Republicans who refused to re-nominate him because he voted for TARP—says that although his career is over, "I hope that we can get the word out that TARP, number one, did save the world from a financial meltdown, and, number two, did so in a manner that I believe won’t cost the taxpayer anything."

Jack Mahoney, dressed as Senator 'Jack Betrayus', participates in a Capitol Hill anti-bailout demonstration, October 2008.
Jack Mahoney, dressed as Senator 'Jack Betrayus', participates in a Capitol Hill anti-bailout demonstration, October 2008.
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

I know across the country Americans will rejoice in its demise.TARP was something our country should never have had to do. - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

It was probably the only effective method available to us to keep from having a financial meltdown much worse than we actually had. - Douglas J. Elliott of
the Brookings Institution think-tank

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
9%
1%
79%
1%
5%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 56 comments
MarkFL
Oct 2, 2010 11:12 AM CDT
People knew all along that it was a loan and not a give away. It wasn't the most secure loan but the aim has always been on collecting that money back. People are pissed for two reasons. Liberals dislike the TARP because rich corporations that f!@#$ed everything up in the first place got saved while the rest of us got screwed. Conservatives don't like it because they can't read. Everyone else is somewhere in the middle.
SilenceDogood
Oct 1, 2010 9:00 PM CDT
So from what I can see, GWB did a good job?
pg13
Oct 1, 2010 4:41 PM CDT
I wouldn't brag about the bailout either. Regardless of how much the bailout costs us, bailouts encourage risky behavior by our financial institutions. I bet the Teabaggers wouldn't be upset if they saw pictures of the true beneficiaries of the bailouts: the rich old white guys who run Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street kings. That would comfort them, that their old white guys are still running the show and China hasn't taken over yet.

More Newser Stories

Final Bailout Tab: $29B

Taxpayers Will Score $12B on Citigroup Bailout: Treasury

Geithner Unveils New Bank Plan

New Bailout Plan Hinges on Private Investors

Watchdog: TARP Profit Is 'Misconception'


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment