Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Justice Stevens Explains Shift on Death Penalty

Former supporter cites racism, politics, judicial activism

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 28, 2010 6:07 AM CST

(Newser) – Former Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens is making clear for the first time why he switched course on the death penalty in 2008, calling it unconstitutional, the New York Times reports. Writing in the New York Review of Books, Stevens, who supported capital punishment in 1976, reveals his revised belief that racism, politics, and unfairness plague the system.

Stevens argues that, with “regrettable judicial activism,” the Court has removed measures that could help ensure the death penalty is implemented fairly. For example, a 1987 case allowed what are essentially “race-based prosecutorial decisions.” Stevens’ recent outspokenness offers “a new model of what to expect from Supreme Court justices after they leave the bench, one that includes high-profile interviews and provocative speeches,” writes Adam Liptak.

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens addresses the National Japanese American Memorial Foundation luncheon in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 4, 2010.
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens addresses the National Japanese American Memorial Foundation luncheon in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 4, 2010.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens addresses the National Japanese American Memorial Foundation luncheon in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 4, 2010, where he was presented with the foundation's Award for Constitutional Rights, for his code-breaking activities in the Pacific during his World War II service in the Navy as a...
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens addresses the National Japanese American Memorial Foundation luncheon in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 4, 2010, where he was presented with the foundation's...   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
11%
3%
68%
2%
14%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 12 comments
Naked_Emperor
Nov 28, 2010 12:58 PM CST
The constitution hasn't changed. If you think it is unconstitutional today, than it was unconstitutional 20 years ago. What else did you get wrong during your tenure on the bench?
carson
Nov 28, 2010 10:46 AM CST
last year america executed 50 or so people...there were 15,000 or so murders...i doubt there were a lot of politicians or wealthy people committing a super majority of those crimes...statistically they have a pretty low shot at it...they commit other crimes we need to prosecute them for anyway...but the death penalty is a bad idea for more practical reasons
trumanD
Nov 28, 2010 9:17 AM CST
Those that are familiar with the criminal justice system in America, bring attention to the facts of 1) how many innocents are able to be convicted, and; 2) how unfair the system is to the poor, and; 3) that poverty is visited on more of the racial minorities, it is then inherent to be racially unfair. I have always been for the death penalty as an equation of justice ... ie. murder someone, lose your life. But with political and prosecuting unfairness in the system, could never be for the death penalty.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne