Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

'No Child Left Behind' Needs a Bipartisan Facelift

There's a lot that both parties agree on in education reform

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 3, 2011 3:33 PM CST

(Newser) – The new Congress is set to update No Child Left Behind, and it’s a chance to get both sides of the aisle behind real change, writes Arne Duncan in the Washington Post. Both parties share similar concerns about NCLB—its way of labeling schools “failures,” its bubble tests, its flawed teacher standards. And both parties support the act’s transparency measures and some of its data methods, notes the education secretary.

The Obama administration takes these concerns seriously, calling for “more flexibility and fairness in our accountability system, a bigger investment in teachers and principals, and a sharper focus on schools and students most at risk.” And there’s no time to lose: US students are already behind in reading, math, and science, and graduation rates are floundering. Duncan hears the naysayers predicting partisanship will rule the day, but "conventional wisdom serves to prop up the status quo—and is often wrong. Let's do something together for our children that will build America's future, strengthen our economy and reflect well on us all.”

In this July 27, 2010 photo, Education Secretary Arne Duncan speaks about the federal Race to the Top school reform grant competition at the National Press Club in Washington.
In this July 27, 2010 photo, Education Secretary Arne Duncan speaks about the federal "Race to the Top" school reform grant competition at the National Press Club in Washington.   (AP Photo/Drew Angerer)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

I've been told that partisan politics inevitably trumps bipartisan governing. But if I have learned anything as education secretary, it is that conventional wisdom serves to prop up the status quo—and is often wrong. - Arne Duncan

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
3%
13%
0%
74%
0%
10%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 9 comments
Hangernaid
Jan 4, 2011 7:28 AM CST
This is a purely political, news room story. No Child Left Behind is not anything new, it started under LBJ as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. When it came up for reauthorization, it was under Clinton, remember Goals 2000? Then under Bush it came up for reauthorization and became NCLB. NCLB is just a funding bill that uses taxpayer dollars to bribe schools into meeting federal guidelines. It is Educational Prostitution. The Fed waves dollars - State and local school boards drop their drawers and bend over. And then complain about NCLB. NCLB only contributes about 7% of the funding for local education. Repeal NCLB, and get the Federal Government OUT of local education. Schools spend almost as much meeting the requirements (Federal Compliance) as what they get. NCLB needs to go away and NOT be reauthorized. As a conservative teacher, I have to stay in the closet like the gays did 30 years ago. Education and the teachers union are mostly liberal Democrats who complain about NCLB, but want the money. I would prefer to teach a subject and not teach to a test. Let NCLB die, and get the Federal Government OUT of our local schools. Our state Department of Education can handle the job quite nicely, thank you.
allisonisa39e
Jan 4, 2011 5:36 AM CST
Before the Country had a Department of Education each State ran their own education. It was even possible to punish a child who misbehaved.There was no one to council them about how the teacher was being so bad to them. The USA had the best educational system in the World. When you get the Federal Government micromanaging the educational system it flounders. It did far better when the local community exerted responsibility for the school system and it cost far less. The dumb child did get left behind and the bright child moved ahead.
allisonisa39e
Jan 4, 2011 5:24 AM CST
If you have a class containing a kid with an IQ of 150, ten kids with IQs that are average and one kid with an IQ of 90 do you dumb them all down so that the one kid with the low IQ is not left behind ? That is what this program does and it is why the USA is no longer the Country at the top in education.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne