Clarence Thomas: 5 Years Without a Peep
Justice's silence mystifies court observers
By Mark Russell, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 13, 2011 5:39 AM CST
In this Oct. 8, 2010 file photo, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas is seen during the group portrait at the Supreme Court Building in Washington.    (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, file)

(Newser) – It is a strange anniversary coming up for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas—on Feb. 22, it will have been five years since the justice has spoken during a court argument. The other justices average between six questions or remarks a case (Alito) and 25 (Scalia), and no other justice in 40 years has gone a term without speaking at least once during arguments. Thomas has given different reasons for his extended silence, from being self-conscious about his southern dialect to politeness, but he remains a mystery, reports the New York Times.

Ironically, Thomas is considered friendly in private, speaking frequently with students at smaller, regional schools, preferring to talk movies to legal theory (Saving Private Ryan is a favorite). When Thomas has spoken in the past, his questions and comments could be influential, such as in a 2002 case about cross burning in Virginia. “This was a reign of terror, and the cross was a symbol of that reign of terror,” he said. “It was intended to cause fear and to terrorize a population.” But for some, his silence is deafening: “If Justice Thomas holds a strong view of the law in a case, he should offer it,” wrote one journalist in a law review.

View 2 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Clarence Thomas: 5 Years Without a Peep is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 84 comments
Mar 30, 2011 9:47 AM CDT
What's the saying? "Better to keep your mouth shut and thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt?
Feb 13, 2011 5:00 PM CST
He doesn't always Herp, but when he does he Derps.
Feb 13, 2011 4:02 PM CST
I don't know, I think he is storing up. Nothing has greater impact than when a man who is silent chooses his moment to speak. And five years of that, well... he could probably change the overall ruling on whatever case he picks.