Endless Oscar Predictions Ruining the Show
Film critic: The problem is that they're usually right
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Feb 26, 2011 3:14 PM CST
An Oscar statue is protected by a plastic bag on the red carpet in front of the Kodak Theater in Hollywood.   (Getty Images)

(Newser) – As the film critic for the Los Angeles Times, Kenneth Turan loves the Oscars. But he hates the nonstop barrage of predictions that bombard us ahead of the show. His beef "is not that the pundits are often wrong but, frankly, that they are often right," he says. "The more academy votes and voters are studied, the more patterns emerge, the more identifiable signs and meanings become apparent, and the more the awards can be unceremoniously pinned to a board like a captured butterfly."

Where's the fun in that? Tomorrow night, for instance, you can safely wager that The King's Speech, Colin Firth, Natalie Portman, and Christian Bale will triumph. (Those aren't so much Turan's predictions as his begrudging acknowledgment that the forecasters have things figured out.) "I know that genie is never, ever going back into the bottle," he writes, "but part of me ... wishes that it could. Read the full column here.
 

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |  
55%
6%
8%
12%
12%
6%