Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Think You're Pretty Hot? You're Probably Wrong Study finds we have inflated vision of ourselves »

Evangelicals Slam New Gender-Neutral Bible

New translation cuts down on the 'he's'

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 18, 2011 2:21 AM CDT

(Newser) – God is still the Father in the latest version of the world's most popular Bible, but conservative Christians aren't happy with gender-neutral language elsewhere in the 2011 New International Version Bible. The new translation—which Biblical scholars say is a more accurate interpretation of the original Greek and Hebrew—uses "brothers and sisters" in place of "brothers" and tries to avoid using "he" or 'him" as the default reference to an unspecified person, replacing it with "they," AP reports.

But the changes alter "the theological direction and meaning of the text," complained a major Southern Baptist group, which has decided not to endorse the new version. "Evangelicals believe in the verbal plenary inspiration of scripture. We believe every word is inspired by God, not just the broad thought," explained a spokesman for the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. Some linguists, meanwhile, believe the new version doesn't go far enough and say verses like Matthew 4:4, "Man shall not live on bread alone," should have replaced "man" with "people." (Click for another updated Bible ... in which there is no more "booty.")

Text from the New International Version Bible.
Text from the New International Version Bible.   (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)
Copies of the New International Version Bible on display in a book store in Nashville, Tenn.
Copies of the New International Version Bible on display in a book store in Nashville, Tenn.   (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
17%
8%
6%
8%
2%
58%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 14 comments
Botulizard
Apr 24, 2011 8:31 AM CDT
I'm no Christian but this is REALLY dumb.
Park
Mar 18, 2011 8:58 PM CDT
Why not just stick with the King James Version?
summerfairy
Mar 18, 2011 5:01 PM CDT
the problem we run into is that in the west everything revolves around gender but in the Bible "Father" would mean the seat of power, authority and support to a Middle Easterner. In addition, "Man" was the term used in the Middle Ages for humans or all of Mankind. Male and Female were the gender terms. So I have no big problem with changing the gender terms as long as the proper context and meaning is maintained. I see this as a tempest in teapot.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne