Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Supreme Court Stays Two Executions

Both men were to receive controversial new drug

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 5, 2011 5:35 PM CDT

(Newser) – Two death-row inmates have received last-minute reprieves from the Supreme Court, each of whom argued they had lousy lawyers at their trials. In separate rulings, the court put on hold the executions of Daniel Cook in Arizona and Cleve Foster in Texas while their cases are reviewed, reports CNN. Both men were to be executed with a controversial new drug cocktail using the animal anesthetic pentobarbital, though the court did not mention the drug in its decisions.

Regardless, the delay will allow more time to consider the matter, says one of Foster's attorneys. "We are certainly relieved that they will not be rushing to execute Mr. Foster given the many issues surrounding Texas' new lethal injection protocol," he tells AFP. The rulings also might signal that the high court is interested in the issue of inadequate legal representation, notes the Wall Street Journal.

In this March 16 file photo, Texas death row inmate Cleve Foster talks on a phone at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice outside Livingston, Texas.
In this March 16 file photo, Texas death row inmate Cleve Foster talks on a phone at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice outside Livingston, Texas.   (Associated Press)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
31%
11%
19%
10%
25%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 11 comments
CHRiSTFELD
Apr 6, 2011 1:28 AM CDT
The following uncivilized nations are the biggest capital punishment offenders. Here are the numbers they put to death in 2010: China (2000) Iran (252) North Korea (60) Yemen (53) U.S.A. (46) Saudi Arabia (27) Syria (17)
armywife
Apr 5, 2011 9:00 PM CDT
yes, these men were found guilty, BUT if they truly had inadequate counsel, then that opens up reasonable doubt as to their guilt. one must be found guilty *beyond a reasonable doubt*. an innocent man with a crappy lawyer can be found guilty of a crime he did not commit; it happens more than we'd like. if that is what happened with these two men, then the state would be guilty of the murder of an innocent man. it is worth it to delay execution and review the case, to ensure innocent men arent being executed. if they are subsequently deemed to have had adequate council and a fair trial, then their guilty verdict stands and they will be executed. i, for one, would like to be sure that only guilty people get the death penalty.
schmidtkoff
Apr 5, 2011 8:43 PM CDT
insisting upon capital ie states and us sanctioned murder is as barbaric as the afghans going berserk over the burning of the koran.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne