Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Man Butt-Dials 911 While Discussing Murder Plans Floridian is charged after slaying »

Should We Lift Ban on HIV-Positive Organ Donors?

Organs would primarily be used for HIV-positive recipients, say proponents

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 11, 2011 9:19 AM CDT

(Newser) – The US has, as one doctor says, a "huge organ shortage"—but there is one way we could make 500 to 600 more livers and kidneys available each year: lift the ban on HIV-positive donors. A controversial move, yes, but some federal health officials and other experts think it's a good idea, the New York Times reports. HIV-positive organs would primarily be given to HIV-positive donors, and "every HIV-infected one we use is a new organ that takes one more person off the list," the doctor says.

Even for HIV-positive recipients, however, there are concerns. "You could have a donor who has a tougher strain of HIV," says one HIV-positive man who will likely need a liver transplant. But doctors say such risks are manageable if the sickest donors and recipients are screened out. South Africa, the only country known to be conducting such transplants, has seen success. In the US, doctors are looking to start with clinical trials and other research. Some experts believe even HIV-negative patients could potentially receive HIV-positive organs, if their risk of liver or kidney failure outweighs the risk of contracting HIV.

Two organ donor application leaflets are shown in London; the US also has an organ shortage.
Two organ donor application leaflets are shown in London; the US also has an organ shortage.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
27%
0%
13%
52%
7%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 17 comments
CarpeDiem
Apr 12, 2011 2:44 PM CDT
So, what happens when the first HIV positive organ accidently gets used on a HIV negative recipient?
Count-Spatula
Apr 11, 2011 10:08 PM CDT
Some healthcare CEO and a cabal of doctors are behind this; counting the money that this new ethical breech, will make them.
dann0
Apr 11, 2011 4:01 PM CDT
The choice of receiving an organ should be that of the recipient. If you receive an organ, you'll spend the remainder of your life taking immune suppressants. If you receive an HIV liver, even if you don't have it to begin with, you won't die waiting on a list, you'll only have to take a few extra medicines. And oh, you won't die waiting on a list. Sign your donor card and discuss with your family (because they can still say no). This wouldn't even be a discussion if there weren't people dying every day waiting for a heart, liver, or lungs.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne