Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Pulitzers Are Pointless

They're weightless 'footnotes,' not 'headlines': Jack Shafer

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 18, 2011 1:17 PM CDT

(Newser) – The Pulitzer Prizes for journalism are awarded today, but they don’t mean a thing, writes Jack Shafer. “I doubt that one newspaper reader in 10,000 could tell you a day after the Pulitzers are awarded who got the prize for explanatory reporting,” he notes in a 2004 piece, reprinted in Slate today. And that’s just fine: “In a perfect world, the prizes would be treated as footnotes rather than the stuff of headlines.”

That’s because, for one thing, “there's no real science or even fairness behind the picking of winners and losers.” Instead, prizes are distributed “according to a formula composed of one part log-rolling, two parts merit, three parts ‘we owe him one,’ and four parts random distribution.” One paper’s success in a given year doesn’t make it a better paper; it just means the stars were aligned for it. “Put it this way: If another trade association gave itself awards, would its winners get Page One play? Never.”

In this April 7, 2007 file photo, Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr., holds up a previously won Pulitzer Prize medallion.
In this April 7, 2007 file photo, Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr., holds up a previously won Pulitzer Prize medallion.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Prizes are handed out according to a formula composed of one part log-rolling, two parts merit, three parts "we owe him one," and four parts random distribution. - Jack Shafer

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
13%
2%
2%
29%
2%
54%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 12 comments
CarpeDiem
Apr 19, 2011 3:24 PM CDT
"Pulitzers Are Pointless" Good point.
RinoHunter
Apr 19, 2011 9:17 AM CDT
The Pulitzer, ranks right up there with the meaningless Nobel Peace Prize.
HMunster
Apr 19, 2011 7:53 AM CDT
"Pulitzers Are Pointless" Well, of COURSE the Pulitzers are "Pointless". They're ROUND! How could anything round have a point?...

More Newser Stories

No Fiction Pulitzer Awarded for First Time in 35 Years

LA Times Wins Key Pulitzer

Keith's 'No Journalist'— Let Him Donate

Snobs Doomed Enquirer's Pulitzer Bid

Hank Williams Wins Pulitzer


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment