Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

FDA Cracks Down on False Claims for Hand Sanitizers

Agency warns firms claiming their gels battle MRSA

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 21, 2011 5:25 PM CDT

(Newser) – Warning: Hand sanitizers will not make you invincible. They don’t, for example, protect against germs like MRSA, as the FDA pointed out yesterday in a consumer update. Nor do they kill E. coli, salmonella, or the H1N1 virus. It’s not just consumers who don’t get this: The FDA yesterday fired off a round of warning letters to firms that falsely say their sanitizers fight MRSA, the Washington Post notes. In general, the CDC says, soap and water are preferable to sanitizers.

Hand sanitizer at an entrance to the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas.
Hand sanitizer at an entrance to the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas.   (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
10%
3%
66%
11%
6%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 9 comments
Sayyiduna
Apr 27, 2011 12:17 AM CDT
Hand sanitizers aren't a gimmick, people just don't understand what a "sanitizer" is. By definition, a "sanitizer" is a chemical that reduces the amount of potential pathogens on a surface to a safe level. It doesn't just take one germ to make you sick (it depends on the type, of course) but it can take up anywhere from 1 to several million bacteria to constitute an "infectious dose." Which is to say, enough bacteria to overwhelm your immune system and make you sick. You spend a remarkably large amount of time in contact with pathogens, your immune system handles them more often than not. The sanitizers in this sense are not meant to fully kill off and sterilize anything, they just reduce overall populations to safe levels so anything left over can be handled by your immune system. Similarly, hot water and soap are always a better option because the way soap works is by mechanically "scrubbing" transient bacteria off the skin. The soap's structure doesn't allow for bacteria to develop a resistance, it's a surfactant (essentially, these make things easier to wash off with water) so it will remove a good portion if not all of the bacteria which cause disease. People just need to be realistic, full sterility is not economical and in most cases isn't possible OR desirable. For this reason, people need to be aware of the limitations of these chemicals, in addition to washing hands properly. If you're not washing for at least 30 seconds and actually scrubbing the surface (not just tapping them together) then you're NOT removing enough bacteria to sanitize anything.
Sir_Cancelout
Apr 24, 2011 3:48 PM CDT
I always thought those hand sanitizers were a little silly--just another gimmick to sell something! Just wash your hands a few times per day as needed--especially before you eat--and try to keep your hands away from your mouth. You can't go wrong with this simple strategy! The sanitizers could actually do more harm than good because the folks using them might falsely and mistakenly think that they don't need to do anything else!
Spudsy
Apr 22, 2011 11:36 AM CDT
Most of them taste terrible anyway.

More Newser Stories

Pick Your Poison: Swine Flu or Hand Sanitizer

Tainted 'Spicy Tuna' Linked to Salmonella

Feds Knew of Cargill Salmonella in 2010

Ground Turkey Linked to Salmonella Death, Illnesses

Why US Would Be Screwed if E. Coli Hit Our Crops


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment