Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

'My Husband's Circumcision Saved My Life'

It prevented me from getting his HIV: Diane Cole

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted May 25, 2011 1:01 PM CDT | Updated May 29, 2011 1:26 PM CDT

(Newser) – Circumcision haters are out in force these days, with a vote coming later this year in San Francisco on whether to ban the practice entirely. But opponents overlook the health benefits that circumcision brings, specifically how it cuts down on the transmission of HIV, writes Diane Cole in the Wall Street Journal. She should know: "My husband's circumcision saved my life," she writes.

Her late husband, a hemophiliac, acquired HIV through a blood transfusion back when AIDS was an unfamiliar acronym. They had been trying to have kids when they found out—and thus weren't using birth control—but she came up HIV-negative. "In the same way that circumcision vastly diminishes the chance of infecting women with the human papillomavirus that causes cervical cancer, studies suggest that circumcision also helps guard against the transmission of the HIV virus," she writes. It saved her life. "If the San Francisco initiative passes, and encourages other communities to do the same, who knows whose lives won't be saved."

Benjamin Abecassis closes his eyes during his bris, a Jewish circumcision ceremony, on May 15 in San Francisco.
Benjamin Abecassis closes his eyes during his bris, a Jewish circumcision ceremony, on May 15 in San Francisco.   (AP Photo/Noah Berger)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
13%
2%
50%
2%
30%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 102 comments
Herohair
Sep 11, 2012 4:21 AM CDT
And how does that story add up? So she had unprotected sex with a circumcised man who had HIV and didn't catch it? Is that suddenly proof that circumcision prevented it? No. This is not the only case where HIV has not been transmitted, and yes, that includes men who are uncircumcised. This just makes her lucky, not lucky because of a missing foreskin. Studies by both WHO and CDC indicate that circumcision may not reduce HIV transmission from male to female, it only reduces the risk to the man himself. You can not use circumstantial evidence to support a stance you already have, and just because you believe circumcision to be the best idea ever does not mean you can attribute all of the world's miracles to it. A foreskin is only disgusting if the man who owns it is filthy enough to not clean it when he bathes. And frankly, if he doesn't bathe do you really want his penis anywhere near you, uncircumcised or not? To listen to some people go on about foreskins, you'd believe it was some source of shame to have one, that they are somehow an unnatural abomination that should be removed. But is they were so wrong, why do men have them? If you are not religious, there must be some evolutionary purpose to them. If you are religious, why would God saddle men with something that needs cutting off at birth? I thought he made us in his image right? I tell you what, I am terrified of the day when people decide that men's lips are disgusting because they help plaque form on his teeth.
Swen.Ardere
May 30, 2011 3:25 PM CDT
This issue should be decided by a panel of all (or mostly) women judges. If panels of (mostly) male judges are allowed to decide whether a woman can have an abortion (control over her own body), then it's only fair that panels of (mostly) women should be able to decide whether a man gets to have control over his own penis. It really IS that simple.
carbonatedturtle
May 30, 2011 3:19 PM CDT
Why is this headline still appearing at the top of the page almost a week after being posted? Does Mr. Johnson think his lies are going to change anyone's mind?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne