Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

2010 Saw Shock Rise in Carbon Emissions

Experts warn consequences could be dire

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted May 30, 2011 10:43 AM CDT

(Newser) – Greenhouse gas emissions rose by a record amount in 2010, leading to the worst-ever carbon output in history, according to unpublished International Energy Agency estimates. The record rise—which, contrary to some predictions, even the recession couldn’t curb—means that hopes of keeping global warming to a safe level is nearly out of reach, the Guardian reports in an exclusive. The paper had previously reported that in order to prevent potentially “dangerous climate change,” we must keep the global average temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius. But the IEA's chief economist now says that idea is just “a nice Utopia.”

The IEA estimates that 30.6 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide entered the atmosphere last year, most of it from burning fossil fuel. That’s a rise of 1.6 gigatonnes over 2009's figure. "I am very worried. This is the worst news on emissions," says the economist for the IEA, which has calculated that annual emissions must remain below 32 gigatonnes annually through 2020 if we're to escape global warming's worst effects. Another expert warns that if the pattern continues, there will be “a 50% chance of a rise in global average temperature of more than 4C by 2100,” which would lead to “widespread mass migration and conflict.” Click to see the latest power duo to fight climate change.

This Wednesday March 30, 2011 shows the Corus steel plant in IJmuiden, Netherlands.
This Wednesday March 30, 2011 shows the Corus steel plant in IJmuiden, Netherlands.   (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
7%
1%
21%
2%
62%
7%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 15 comments
turdferguson1
May 31, 2011 9:18 PM CDT
weren't there like two huge volcano eruptions last year? that has no effect on this kind of stuff?
MisterPlinkett
May 30, 2011 9:13 PM CDT
of course, because the carbon scam is meant to guilt people into being willing to spend more money.  not to reduce emissions.  make sure you buy your carbon credits from your buddy al gore, you fuckin idiots. pollution = bad carbon = stfu
JesusLovesSomeOfYou
May 30, 2011 8:46 PM CDT
Yeah, right. "Gigatonnes." I even got the red squiggly line under that word when I typed it. Obviously the liberals are making it up. What's next Global Warming 2.0? Not falling for it. Quit trying to scare us with your silly words, lefty scientists.

More Newser Stories

Apple Quits US Chamber, Slams Climate Stance

Rail Travel Pollutes as Much as Flying: Study

Centuries of Trouble Already Locked In by Warming

Calif. Adopts 1st US Plan to Slash Greenhouse Gases

It's Hard to Go Green With the Economy in the Red


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment