Edwards' Legal Gamble Hinges on 2 Questions
For one, was the affair cover-up for political or personal gain?
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Jun 3, 2011 12:10 PM CDT
Rielle Hunter and their baby.   (AP Photo/Jim R. Bounds, File)
camera-icon View 2 more images

(Newser) – John Edwards' decision to forgo a plea deal and fight charges that he violated campaign finance law in court comes at no small risk. He faces up to 30 years in prison on the six counts (along with $1.5 million in fines) if he loses. The case hinges on two key questions, explains the Raleigh News & Observer: whether donor payments to mistress Rielle Hunter and aide Andrew Young were meant to keep Edwards' 2008 campaign alive, and whether Edwards knew about the payments. Business Insider provides a look at key allegations in the indictment.

The Edwards camp argues that the money was used to keep the affair secret from the candidate's late wife, Elizabeth, and had no political connections. The funds never went into campaign accounts but instead got funneled to Hunter or Andrews directly or through third parties. For a who's who in what should be a convoluted case, click to see the News & Observer's list of key players.
 

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |  
51%
23%
6%
13%
2%
4%