Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Historians Say Palin Was Right About Paul Revere

But they admit it begrudgingly, notes the 'Boston Herald'

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 6, 2011 11:09 AM CDT

(Newser) – Sarah Palin insists her claim that Paul Revere "warned the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms" was actually not a flub, and it turns out some historians are backing her up on this one—reluctantly, notes the Boston Herald. In a 1798 letter wherein Revere describes his famous ride, he recalls being captured by British officers and warning them "there would be five hundred Americans there in a short time for I had alarmed the Country all the way up."

A history professor acknowledges that Revere warned the British of the Americans' mobilization, and adds that Palin was right about church bells ringing and warning shots being fired, too. Even so, he thinks she was mostly just "lucky in her comments," he says. The Paul Revere House's research director notes that Revere was probably bluffing when he talked to the Brits, but concedes that his words could be taken as a warning. "But," he adds, "I don't know if that's really what Mrs. Palin was referring to." Click to see how Palin fans are responding to the whole brouhaha.

In this June 2, 2011, file photo former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, holding a booklet depicting Paul Revere, speaks briefly with the media as she tours Boston's North End neighborhood.
In this June 2, 2011, file photo former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, holding a booklet depicting Paul Revere, speaks briefly with the media as she tours Boston's North End neighborhood.   (AP Photo/Steven Senne, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Check out another Depressing story: Woman Swept From Car, Dies, in Texas Floods
15%
Hilarious
5%
Intriguing
2%
Depressing
20%
Brilliant
3%
Scary
55%
Annoying
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 73 comments
lvan
Jun 7, 2011 11:39 PM CDT
Why every time I hear name Sarah Palin I think of ball gags?
gzuckier
Jun 7, 2011 10:49 PM CDT
So where is the part about the British taking away our guns?  Monomaniacal paranoia isn't pretty.
Jesse
Jun 7, 2011 10:12 AM CDT
The historians who agree with Palin are embarrassingly wrong; we can only hope they have not earned tenure at any institution of higher learning. Palin's contention is that "warning the British" was part of Revere's mission. This absolutely was *not* part of his intended agenda. During the course of his *actual* mission - warning the colonists, specifically Samuel Adams and John Hancock - he was *captured* by the British. By Revere's own recorded account, a British commander held a firearm to his head and threatened to blow Revere's head off if he did not answer specific questions. Under obvious duress, Revere revealed the information that was requested. Contrary to Palin's mangling of the historical record - and the accompanying rationalization of her error by apparently less-than-studious scholars - it was *not*, "part of Paul Revere’s ride ... to warn the British who were already there, that you’re not going to succeed, you’re not going to take American arms, you’re not going to be your own well-armed person’s private militia that we are going to have." Furthermore, Revere did not shoot guns and ring bells - these actions were taken by residents of the towns Revere raced through. History is *not* about the historian - it's about *facts*. Anything other than *facts* is not history - it is interpretive literature.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne