Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Think You're Pretty Hot? You're Probably Wrong Study finds we have inflated vision of ourselves »

Family Fights US Mint Over Rare Coins

1933 double-eagles were supposed to have been destroyed

By Luke Kelly-Clyne,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 9, 2011 1:22 PM CDT

(Newser) – A Philadelphia family is going head-to-head with the US government in a legal battle over ownership of 10 rare "double-eagle" coins worth $20 each when minted, and now valued in the millions. The coins were first produced by the US Mint in 1933 but never distributed. All but two were supposed to have been destroyed, but 10 somehow ended up in the hands of gold dealer Israel Switt, explains the New York Times. His heirs say they found them in a safety deposit box after he died and are fighting to keep them.

The government says that Switt stole these coins—and others, possibly with the help of a cashier at the Philadelphia Mint—and that his family knows they're stolen and should return them. It says Switt is linked to every double-eagle that's shown up over the past 70-odd years, including one sold by a dealer in 2002 for $7.6 million. The family's attorney argues that his clients could have gotten the coins through any number of legal scenarios and calls this an example of government abuse of power.

This undated file photo combination released by the US Mint, shows the two sides of a 1933 double eagle gold coin.
This undated file photo combination released by the US Mint, shows the two sides of a 1933 "double eagle" gold coin.   (AP Photo/U.S. Mint, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
64%
2%
9%
4%
16%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 11 comments
n230099
Jul 10, 2011 10:47 AM CDT
I'd destroy them before I give them to the pigs.
Rational.-Anarchist
Jul 9, 2011 10:44 PM CDT
Even if they were stolen, the alleged thief is dead, and what about this thing called "statute of limitation" on non  capitol crimes?
The_Old_Wolf
Jul 9, 2011 4:30 PM CDT
This doesn't sound like typical government abuse of power. The mint can make a compelling case for theft since none of these coins were ever supposed to be in circulation, and since all of the existing specimens can be traced to the same individual. It would be as though my grandfather had worked for the mint, and all of a sudden I come forth with an uncirculated roll of copper 1943 lincoln cents...
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne