Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Irene Coverage Went Off the Deep End

'Category 5' reporting on a Category 1 storm: Howard Kurtz

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Aug 29, 2011 1:58 PM CDT

(Newser) – Cable news reported on Hurricane Irene as if it was Armageddon in the making, and in the end, the coverage was a tempest in a teapot, writes Howard Kurtz for the Daily Beast. "The tsunami of hype on this story was relentless, a Category 5 performance that was driven in large measure by ratings." Producers, keen to keep viewers, didn't want to break away from coverage, and played up footage from local stations. Politicians kept the drama high by holding constant press conferences.

Sure, there was deep water on Long Beach, but it’s "a narrow barrier island three feet above sea level and prone to flooding." Yes, a man was saved from rising waters in New York, but this is stuff that "we routinely see in flooded Mississippi River towns." Indeed, "you could almost hear the air come out of the media’s hot-air balloon of constant coverage when Hurricane Irene was downgraded to a tropical storm." A glimmer of reality crept in at the end, with Anderson Cooper conceding that the situation in Manhattan was "actually not bad at all." Lesson learned? Not a chance, concludes Kurtz, who predicts coverage will be just as blustery next time. Click to read his entire column.

NBC reporter Peter Alexander attempts to broadcast from the windswept Coney Island boardwalk in New York as Hurricane Irene became intensified Sunday, Aug. 28 2011.
NBC reporter Peter Alexander attempts to broadcast from the windswept Coney Island boardwalk in New York as Hurricane Irene became intensified Sunday, Aug. 28 2011.   (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
15%
3%
2%
55%
3%
22%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 38 comments
Snoozer
Aug 30, 2011 2:27 PM CDT
Why does everybody think that "their" hurricane is worse than "your" hurricane? People died in this motherfucker, so shut the hell up about hype.
Cannibal_Karl
Aug 30, 2011 2:41 AM CDT
I dont understand why people are attacking the media about this. 44 people have died so far, it was a serious storm. Not to mention that how much damage there is and how much worse it could have been considering less than a week earlier the east coast was rattled with large enough earthquake to damage major structures. People would not be bitching if they saw the washington monument collapse. The media was covering it all the time giving constant information and updates to people. I don't live near the storm but I have family and friends that do and I was glad to be able to get info about it all the time, so I could check up on those I care about. Weather patterns were projected and people responded accordingly. If one life was saved because the media did nothing but talk about the storm and it scared someone to move out, then it was a better news weekend then being barraged by nonsense about Lindsey Lohan and hyperbolic partisan ramblings.  I believe the phrase to describe the whining about the media in this case is counter-factual. They acted, people died, but the storm could have been worse. They can't prove that had their actions actually made things better, so they are stuck taking the blame for exaggerating the storm when they probably saved a lot of lives.
DontLikeYou
Aug 29, 2011 7:12 PM CDT
The media embarrassed itself, yet again.

More Newser Stories

Tropical Storms Nate, Maria Form

Katia Strengthens Into Hurricane

After Katrina, Governors Ace Hurricane Politics

As States Take Stock, Irene's Toll Hits 44

Weather Reporter Wallows in ... Raw Sewage?


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment