Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Yes, It's a Ponzi Scheme —but We Can Fix It

Social Security can be easily saved, with political courage: Krauthammer

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 16, 2011 10:44 AM CDT

(Newser) – Rick Perry keeps riling people by calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme. But guess what, writes Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post: It is a Ponzi scheme. In fact, it's almost the very definition of one. The big difference is that a Ponzi scheme is illegal while Social Security is a mandatory government program—but that little detail won't make the math work any better. Given US demographics, the program is doomed to fail.

"Of course it’s a Ponzi scheme. So what?" Krauthammer asks. "It’s also the most vital, humane, and fixable of all social programs. The question for the candidates is: Forget Ponzi—are you going to fix Social Security?" The solution is relatively simple, he adds: "Change the cost-of-living measure, means-test for richer recipients and, most important, raise the retirement age." After all, FDR never intended the program to "provide two decades of greens fees for baby boomers." Full column here.

Bogus documents, including Social Security cards, are displayed in this file photo.
Bogus documents, including Social Security cards, are displayed in this file photo.   (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

In a Ponzi scheme, the people who invest early get their money out with dividends. But these dividends don’t come from any profitable or productive activity—they consist entirely of money paid in by later participants. - Charles Krauthammer

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
2%
8%
3%
62%
1%
24%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 19 comments
Dave99
Sep 16, 2011 2:26 PM CDT
Lift the cap and get the rich freeloaders to pull their weight. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/social_security/jan-june05/ss_6-15.html clip - PAUL SOLMAN: Now the income cap on the payroll tax has risen slowly since 1982, indexed to average earnings. If earnings continue to rise, as in the past, the cap would rise but not nearly enough to keep pace with projected Social Security benefits.  Removing the cap entirely, thereby imposing a flat tax of 12.4 percent on all earnings - essentially a $100 billion a year tax increase on the wealthy -- would more than completely close the funding gap
JackNelsonSteward
Sep 16, 2011 2:14 PM CDT
Well, Chuck is dangling by his own description,  Social Security is paid for in the present by people paying into it NOW ... There was a surplus for a couple of generations and Congress, in its infinite wisdom, sucked up the cash and left a "Trust  Fund" full of Treasury Bonds ... the same bonds China and Japan buy ,.. and currently the Trust is 1.2 TRILLION in the BLACK. which will ensure the solvency of the program for something like 35 years. If Congress lifts the contribution ceiling and people making over $106,000.00 continue to pay into the system it will remain solvent for 75 YEARS ... at the same benefit rates it currently pays.
Spudsy
Sep 16, 2011 2:13 PM CDT
Ok Krauty, now will you help by convincing your corporate masters to keep jobs in America so those boomers don't have to head out to the golf course so early in life?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne