Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Calif. Bans Circumcision Bans

Assemblyman boasts he's protecting 'parental rights'

By Mary Papenfuss,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 3, 2011 1:20 AM CDT

(Newser) – The state of California has snipped San Francisco's uppity bid to erect a ban on circumcision. Any such ban is now banned in a law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown. Ban backers had collected nearly 8,000 signatures to put the measure to a vote in the city in November, arguing that circumcision is unnecessary surgery that can be dangerous. The issue was pretty much moot, even before the new state law, because a judge had already blocked the ballot measure that stirred controversy among Jews, Muslims, and many in the medical community. The state law was introduced by Democratic Assemblyman Mike Gatto, who told the Los Angeles Times that the measure, signed yesterday, would "protect parental rights and liberties."

Angry girl
Angry girl   (©elvissa)
David Pinckney, who described himself as an intactivist, demonstrates outside a San Francisco courthouse on Thursday, July 28, 2011. A judge today struck down a proposed ballot measure banning circumcision saying it would violate a law that makes regulating medical procedures a function of the state, not cities.
David Pinckney, who described himself as an intactivist, demonstrates outside a San Francisco courthouse on Thursday, July 28, 2011. A judge today struck down a proposed ballot measure banning circumcision...   (AP Photo/Noah Berger)
David Lane of Fairfax, Calif., holds up a sign against circumcision as state Assemblyman Mike Gatto of Los Angeles speaks outside a medical clinic during a news conference in San Francisco, Thursday, July 21, 2011. Two state Assembly members plan to introduce a bill that would preempt local governments from...
David Lane of Fairfax, Calif., holds up a sign against circumcision as state Assemblyman Mike Gatto of Los Angeles speaks outside a medical clinic during a news conference in San Francisco, Thursday,...   (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
8%
5%
21%
52%
3%
11%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 31 comments
George-Jetson
Nov 4, 2011 4:07 AM CDT
San Francisco is a giant nut house.
jpr11011
Oct 3, 2011 8:49 PM CDT
I believe that it is male genital mutilation.  As Ivan pointed out- how is it any different than cutting off a woman's clitoral hood?  Both are painful and reduce pleasure.  I am female btw. 
lvan
Oct 3, 2011 1:28 PM CDT
Majority don't even think about the issue. For most parents it's like "would you like fries with that?" Call it for what it really is and don't trivialize it. Even type 1 female circumcision (removal of clitoral hood) is considered genital mutilation. I encourage moms to be to watch some videos of child being cut. In newborns foreskin is fused to glandis. Just separating it cases extreme pain. This is why I can't get a good blowjob in this country. Girls just suck to hard.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne