Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

US Wrote Secret Memo to Let It Kill a Citizen

50-page memo said killing only ok if could not capture

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 9, 2011 7:33 AM CDT

(Newser) – The secret memo that allowed the assassination of American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen last month justified his killing as legal because he could not be captured alive, reports the New York Times. Completed in June 2010, the 50-page memo also was written narrowly, to deny the general targeted killings of American citizens, and only allowed killing Awlaki because he was active in the war with al-Qaeda, he posed a danger to Americans, and the Yemen government was unable to stop him.

The White House has refused to comment on the Awlaki killing, as it is officially a classified mission, but the New Mexico-born terrorist leader was reportedly put on a kill-or-capture list soon after the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound plane on Christmas 2009. The memo dismissed a ban on assassinations, as well as arguments based on the Constitution's Fourth and Fifth amendments, because Awlaki was active in armed conflict and is a wartime enemy. The memo did impose some limits, however, including one on civilian casualties that apparently delayed the strike on Awlaki for several weeks until he moved out of a village to a less-populated area.

In this Nov. 8, 2010 file image taken from video and released by SITE Intelligence Group on Monday, Anwar al-Awlaki speaks in a video message posted on radical websites.
In this Nov. 8, 2010 file image taken from video and released by SITE Intelligence Group on Monday, Anwar al-Awlaki speaks in a video message posted on radical websites.   (AP Photo/SITE Intelligence Group, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Check out another Brilliant story: Cleveland Kidnap Victims' Choice: Do They Want the...
2%
Hilarious
5%
Intriguing
5%
Depressing
55%
Brilliant
31%
Scary
2%
Annoying
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 41 comments
wasntme
Oct 9, 2011 5:00 PM CDT
What's really interesting is how the Republican Party promotes itself as tough on crime and defense. Than they bash Obama for being tough on crime and defense. If you agree with the so called "Patriot Act" and "No Child Left Behind" you have no complaint here. We only need to call this action "Protect America Memo" and everything will be OK.
Fascist_Jack
Oct 9, 2011 12:09 PM CDT
Technically, he got killed for "free speech." :)  Now, I'm not arguing against actually killing this dirty Muslim, but when you look at things objectively, technically Jane Fonda could have been killed in Vietnam for what she did back then...under these new subvert laws. Let this be a reminder to Liberals, who believe in surrendering EVERYTHING to the State, that the state is not infallible.  When I see a "occupy Washington" by the Left, then I'll believe otherwise.
finkster
Oct 9, 2011 11:42 AM CDT
This man was a traitor to his country and fought against America in the war on terrorism.  He would have gladly killed innocent American lives in a heartbeat  I have no sympathy for him and believe the government did the right thing.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne