Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

The Obama Doctrine: Silent War

War on Terror has gone 'undercover': Roger Cohen

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 28, 2011 1:12 PM CST

(Newser) – Make no mistake about it, there is an Obama Doctrine—but you won’t hear about it from the man himself. That’s because it’s a “doctrine of silence,” writes Roger Cohen in the New York Times. “America has decided that conventional wars of uncertain outcome in Iraq and Afghanistan are a bad way to fight terrorists and that far cheaper, more precise tools for eliminating enemies”—like drones and cyberwarfare—“are preferable.” In choosing this approach, President Obama has picked the lesser of two evils, Cohen asserts.

Still, “no American can feel entirely comfortable” with Obama’s decision. That’s “because these legally borderline, undercover options invite repayment in kind, undermine the American commitment to the rule of law, and make allies uneasy.” It’s time for Obama to explain why America has “replaced fighting terror with killing terrorists,” Cohen notes. “Just because it’s impossible to talk about some operations undertaken within this doctrine does not mean the entire doctrine can remain cloaked in silence.” Click for the full column.

President Barack Obama salutes as he steps off Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House November 26, 2011.
President Barack Obama salutes as he steps off Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House November 26, 2011.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
41%
3%
23%
13%
17%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 65 comments
Dale
Nov 29, 2011 8:04 AM CST
More hope & change, not to mention transparency. If you believe this I have a bridge in New York, I want to sell you. Obama thinks that majority of Americans are idiots,  maybe he is right.
toeser
Nov 29, 2011 7:24 AM CST
If a liberal won't end two useless wars, we have no hope.  One of my major apprehensions with McCain was that he would never exit our Middle East wars.  Then to my shock and surprise Obama greatly expanded the war in Afghanistan.  These wars DO NOT make us any safer.  They just drain our Treasury and kill our troops.  Is Ron Paul the only politician that would end them?
The_Truth
Nov 28, 2011 6:55 PM CST
Except Barack Hussein Obama II replaced fighting terror and killing terrorists by commiting terror, supporting terrorists, and killing innocent civilians. You can thank Obama for the 150,000+ innocent civilians killed in Libya due to senseless bombing and supporting of Al-Qaeda assets like Belhaj. In Barack Husseins own words, "American pilots flew French fighter jets off a French carrier in the Mediterranean Sea during the operation. “Allies don’t get any closer than that,” he said." http://www.defense.gov//news/newsarticle.aspx?id=65965

More Newser Stories

5 Questions to Ask Before Starting a War

US to Iran: Give Us Back Our Drone, Please

Let's Not Forget the Cost of War

B+ for Obama Foreign Policy, F for Not Owning It

Saudi King Calls Iraq War Illegal


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment