Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Canada Slammed for Kyoto Pullout

Canada gov't says fines huge, no real environmental help

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Dec 14, 2011 3:25 AM CST | Updated Dec 14, 2011 4:57 AM CST

(Newser) – Countries and environmentalist groups around the world are slamming Canada for pulling out of the Kyoto climate treaty on Monday, reports the Guardian. "Preposterous" and "an excuse to shirk responsibility," was how the withdrawal was described by China, the world's largest carbon dioxide producer. The UN climate chief was more polite but just as unhappy with the move, saying, "I regret Canada's withdrawal and am surprised over its timing." Even Japan—which doesn't plan to sign the next phase of the Kyoto treaty—called Canada's withdrawal "disappointing."

Canada defended its position, unsurprisingly, saying the new treaty would do nothing to reduce pollution and would only result in massive fines and job losses. Despite agreeing in the original 1997 treaty to reduce carbon emissions 6% by 2012, its emissions have risen 30%, and with Canada increasingly mining its western oil sands, that number will keep rising. With the new treaty's proposal to fine countries for violating its carbon targets, Canada would have had to spend $14 billion in carbon emission permits. But with big polluters such as China, the United States, Brazil, Indonesia, and India not covered by the treaty, "it is scientifically meaningless and economically farcical," wrote one observer in the National Post.

This June 25, 2008 photo shows an aerial view just north of Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada, where the world's largest oil companies are building massive open pit mines to get at the oil sands.
This June 25, 2008 photo shows an aerial view just north of Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada, where the world's largest oil companies are building massive open pit mines to get at the oil sands.   (AP Photo/Canadian Press, Eamon Mac Mahon, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Our favorite Taiwanese animators offer their take on Canada's Kyoto withdrawal.   (NMAWorldEdition)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
10%
5%
19%
48%
3%
14%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 28 comments
ReasonInTimesOfRage
Jan 1, 2012 7:32 AM CST
My view is this: Until all the countries in the world live up to the same standards set in any "global agreement", then any agreements as to global climate accord of preserving the planet are useless. The main reason is excluding/"classifying" one country as "developing" vs. others that are "developed" nullifies the whole reason for the agreement in the first place. China and India want no part of these agreements; whether they be signed in Kyoto, Durban, Copenhagen, or Kathmandu. India's PM Singh told Mrs. Clinton that the issue was "off the table", if my memory serves me correctly. In addition, the use of carbon credits, on top of the "cap-and-trade" legislation proposed, is not well thought out, rigs the system, and erodes the objectives of the agreement(s) the governments sought to achieve in the first place. Using two sets of rules never works in the end - whether it be playing cards - or something as important as this issue is.
JamaicaJim
Dec 18, 2011 5:57 AM CST
Canada: One smart country. The Kyoto "accord": Total bull.
RDSCOTT
Dec 17, 2011 3:14 PM CST
Is Oilsands one word or two?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne