Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

FBI Considered Sting Against ... Newt?

Washington Post story is a 'hit job,' writes conservative blogger

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Dec 16, 2011 10:32 AM CST

(Newser) – Most unusual political story of the day: The Washington Post, following up on a story at the DC Bureau blog, reports that the FBI considered a sting operation against Newt Gingrich while he was House speaker but ultimately decided against it because the evidence was too flimsy. It's a convoluted tale, but the gist is that an arms dealer accused Gingrich's wife at the time, Marianne, of soliciting a multimillion-dollar bribe. In exchange, she would use her sway with Newt to get the Iraqi arms embargo lifted. Marianne Gingrich says none of it is true, the arms dealer is now dead, and all this allegedly happened about 15 years ago.

At Hot Air, Ed Morrissey accuses the Post of a "hit job" on Gingrich. "So, let’s get this straight. The FBI heard second- and third-hand that an arms dealer was bragging about having connections to Gingrich, who would singlehandedly lift the arms embargo on Saddam Hussein’s Iraq ... because a 'cooperating witness' told them that he talked to someone who said he was acting on Marianne Gingrich’s behalf." The FBI looked into it and passed "because they had no evidence that Gingrich even knew any of this was taking place." This, he concludes, is a "non-story" that would not have been published against a Democratic candidate. Read the full Post story here.

Newt Gingrich speaks during a Republican presidential debate in Sioux City, Iowa, Thursday.
Newt Gingrich speaks during a Republican presidential debate in Sioux City, Iowa, Thursday.   (AP Photo/Eric Gay, Pool)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
65%
9%
2%
6%
8%
9%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 15 comments
without_hate
Dec 18, 2011 6:30 AM CST
Once again the Washington Post is guilty of yellow dog journalism. I often wonder if these pieces are written to distract us from the corruption in the Obama Administration. If we waste our time on a non story then we lose focus on the fact that Holder has lied to the congress and is guilty of crimes.  Clean up your act Washington Post. The Inquirer has more creditable than you do with the obvious hit piece.
LoginsSuck
Dec 16, 2011 2:31 PM CST
Whaaaaa? This is spaghetti politics. Throw it all at the wall and see what sticks. Of all the crap Newt has pulled you want to do a story on this? I am embarrassed for you. Here let me help you with another story; My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Newt pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious. With all the real stuff he is done, you should be focusing on putting out those facts for the voter.
JamaicaJim
Dec 16, 2011 12:54 PM CST
Someone needs to investigate the ozone layer, as Newt's wife is responsible for widening it daily using a crop duster to spritz her helmet head. Al Gore is calling...he wants your John Frieda bottle!
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne