Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Yale Daily News Sat on QB Sex Assault Story

And considered calling for a private jet to be hired for Patrick Witt

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 27, 2012 5:09 PM CST

(Newser) – The Patrick Witt sex assault story gets messier: The Yale Daily News, which was just last year named the one of the gutsiest campus newspapers, knew for months that the Yale quarterback and onetime Rhodes candidate had been accused of sexual assault, but sat on the story. On Jim Romenesko's blog, last year's opinion editor reveals that the paper knew about the charges as early as November, as confirmed by multiple people who used to be or are still involved with the paper. And that's not all: During this period of time, the editor-in-chief of the paper actually considered running an editorial urging wealthy alumni to charter a private jet for Witt, so he wouldn't be forced to make his seemingly heroic choice between the Yale-Harvard game and his Rhodes interview.

A member of the paper's managing board tells Gawker the editorial never made it into the paper. Meanwhile, Witt has denied that his Rhodes candidacy was suspended over the allegations, and adds that he had made his decision between the game and the interview before the Rhodes Trust was aware of the accusation, the New York Times reports. Deadspin has the full statement from Witt's rep; it claims that after being made aware of the "informal" complaint against Witt, the Rhodes Trust simply asked for an additional letter of reference from Yale on Witt's behalf, but Witt had already decided to withdraw his candidacy at that point. Many questions remain, including whether those who endorsed Witt's application in the first place knew about the allegations.

In this Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2011 file photo, Yale quarterback Patrick Witt speaks during a news conference in New York.
In this Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2011 file photo, Yale quarterback Patrick Witt speaks during a news conference in New York.   (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
15%
7%
50%
0%
15%
13%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
bewilderbeast
Jan 28, 2012 12:31 AM CST
Why is it that people seem to think football - and jocks - are holy or untouchable? It's time football - and all sports - were assigned their rightful (lowly) place in society. More especially at educational institutions, f'heaven's sake! It's a game - like tiddlywinks. Exactly like tiddlywinks, it actually doesn't matter who plays it or who wins - its. a. game.
Nxxxx
Jan 27, 2012 8:07 PM CST
Trial by media is the new black....deep ugly bottomless black.
Scaramouche
Jan 27, 2012 7:13 PM CST
Well, since the charges hadn't yet been substantiated, it might be considered irresponsible to destroy someone's image in the public simply because someone had leveled a charge. If the prosecuting attorney decides the charges have merit, and proceeds to bring the guy to trial, then by all means run the stories. It's news. But if the accusation is unfounded, why should the guy's image be tarnished? People lie about other people all the time, so it's unfair to automatically assume guilt just because it's a woman making the accusation.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne