Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

The Church Has to Live With Birth Control

Gail Collins doesn't think new rules are impinging on religious freedom

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 9, 2012 12:42 PM CST

(Newser) – The furor over President Obama's decision to force Catholic employers to provide health care that covers contraceptives brought a story to mind for Gail Collins. Her mother-in-law once told her that, when she'd confessed to a priest she was using birth control, he replied, "You're no better than a whore on the street." These days the clergy is less judgmental, but the story shows "why bishops are not the only Roman Catholics who are touchy about the issue of contraception," she writes in the New York Times.

Studies show that virtually all sexually active Catholic women have used the pill, despite church dogma. Bishops, of course, are entitled to teach that dogma anyway, Collins says, but "religions don't get to force their particular dogma on the larger public." The new rules exempt churches, but cover places like universities and hospitals, which are full of non-Catholic employees. If employers can deny these people coverage based on their own beliefs, Collins concludes, "What happens if an employer belongs to a religion that forbids certain types of blood transfusions?" Click for the full column.

Priests shouldn't be able to deny birth control to hospital employees, Gail Collins argues.
Priests shouldn't be able to deny birth control to hospital employees, Gail Collins argues.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We are arguing about whether women who do not agree with the church position, or who are often not even Catholic, should be denied health care coverage that everyone else gets because their employer has a religious objection to it. - Gail Collins

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
3%
7%
74%
1%
13%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 188 comments
LetsBtolerant
Feb 10, 2012 6:55 AM CST
USLady--- this does not force anything on anyone. That is what is happening NOW -- the church has been allowed to force its dogma on employees... "No contraceptives for you!" This simply ALLOWS employees to get contraceptives. It does not FORCE them on anyone! Get the facts before you rant!
VeneVidi
Feb 10, 2012 5:41 AM CST
Women working for a catholic organisation have exactly the same right to contraceptives as women working for another organisation. Why is this an issue? Human rights ALWAYS SUPERCEDE religious rights. If a child of Jehovah’s Witness parents needs a blood transfusion, the court will/should appoint the doctor as a temporary custodian. In this case, the government must protect its citizens from discrimination based on their employer's religious beliefs. Human health MUST SUPERCEDE human superstition. Or we will never improve as a species. By the way, there are 8000 new instances of child sexual abuse alleged in Milwaukee Archdiocese. Wouldn't you think that bishops should think about other things than put their noses where they don't belong?
USLady
Feb 9, 2012 11:56 PM CST
The president -none of them have a right to try to enforce anything like this on the people. No matter what excuse they use. This is  horrible attack on  the church without any doubt from most of the people-what we take,what we eat,what we do,is our business not theirs!,Obama is against the church,but he would tell you he could walk on water to get your vote! but he is a sinking ship in this election.Obama even had a cross painted over at Georgetown before he would talk.Because he did not want the cross seen behind him.He does not stand for God or our children,or our faith.It is something to be angry about,but i would rather someone did something to get the jerk out of office instead of get just mad.We know he is not doing the people or the country right! what are they waiting for more and more BS from BO! If anyone else was braking the law and going against our country they would get locked up.The same goes for the president,even more so! he is suppose to be upholding our laws more then anyone,that is not the case.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne