Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Reddit Outlaws Racy Pictures of Children

Outside pressure appears to force website's hand

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 13, 2012 8:47 AM CST

(Newser) – Before yesterday, link aggregator Reddit had no official ban on users posting "suggestive or sexual content featuring minors," but that changed with a posting from administrators last night. Reddit explained that it's now banning such content, despite the concern that the ban will prove to be a "slippery slope" for the site, which New York's Daily Intel blog notes has defined itself with its extremely hands-off approach and fervent support of free speech. "We will tirelessly defend the right to freely share information on reddit in any way we can, even if it is offensive or discusses something that may be illegal," the posting notes, but child pornography "is a toxic and unique case." The site noted that in the case of child porn, it previously abided by "strict legal guidelines" provided by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Daily Intel notes that Reddit appears to have folded after taking heat from forum members on the website Something Awful. After a user posted about Reddit's policy (or, at the time, lack thereof) on sexualized images of children, other users joined in and ultimately engaged in a "Redditbomb" to force the issue. There's also the fact that Anderson Cooper aired a negative report on the issue in September of last year, during which a Reddit co-founder defended the questionable content by pointing out that as a collection of links, Reddit doesn't actually host the material. Even so, the issue had obviously become "a liability," Daily Intel notes. Click for more on the issue.

Reddit's front page.
Reddit's front page.   (Reddit.com)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
6%
6%
66%
6%
12%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 9 comments
ofgatto
Feb 13, 2012 6:48 PM CST
Post is not reply. Oops.
AndyPlan
Feb 13, 2012 3:12 PM CST
This article was so wrong. What really happened, was there where "subreddits" (forum categories) that where linked to LEGAL teens and under aged children who where CLOTHED. (Not child porn). People where complaining that the most people who visited those where pedophiles, and it's no better than having actual child porn. So they decided to close all those subreddits. There never was child porn. If there was, a user would be banned, and possibly reported with content removed. They wouldn't risk the multi-million user website and allow child porn.
Smegma
Feb 13, 2012 1:50 PM CST
Finally.

More Newser Stories

NBA's Birdman Probed for Online Crimes Against Kids

Child Porn Suspect Wields Samurai Sword on Computer

Mexico Investigates 6th-Graders' Sex Video

Wash. Busts 'Ready to Snap' Army Colonel

Dying Fan Gets Sneak Peek at Book Series


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment