Global Warming's Cost on Oceans: $2T a Year by 2100
SEI report estimates 4-degree rise over the century
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Mar 21, 2012 10:31 AM CDT
A fisheries biologist examines a coral reef in in St. Croix, Virgin Islands, after bleaching from record hot water followed by disease killed ancient and delicate coral there, in this 2005 file photo.   (AP Photo/U.S. Geological Survey, Caroline Rogers, File)

(Newser) – Unless action is taken to protect them, damage to the world's oceans could reach $1.98 trillion annually by 2100, according to a study released today by the Stockholm Environment Institute. The principle culprit: climate change, which will cause rising sea levels, ocean acidification, marine pollution, species migrations, and cause tropical cyclones, Reuters reports. The report assumes temperatures will rise about 4 degrees Celsius over the century, but if governments can limit that to, say, 2.2 degrees, SEI says that would "save" almost $1.4 trillion of those damages.

Nitrogen-rich fertilizers and waste are playing a role as well, stripping the ocean of oxygen and creating what are called hypoxic dead zones. Oceanic experts have already found such zones in more than 500 places. The cost estimate includes $639 billion in lost tourism money, and another $458 billion caused by the fact that warming waters will be unable to absorb as much carbon dioxide. It doesn't include the cost of species that could be wiped out.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Your Take
58% of people agree
that it's Depressing
Check Out Another Depressing Story
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 13 comments
Mar 27, 2012 2:31 PM CDT
I am happy I will be dead in the next 12 years. I hope that I am not reincarnated back into the hell-hole this planet will become.
Mar 21, 2012 6:07 PM CDT
The article claims that "the damage could reach $1.98 trillion ANNUALLY by 2100" that equates to a total of $174.24 trillion by 2100. The recommended changes according to the study would "save $1.4 trillion of those damages" (approximately 0.8% of the damage they report could be the total cost by 2100) - and at what cost financially and at what impact to other areas of the environment? As an example, how much damage to the environment would be caused by the tourist that could spend "$639 billion in lost tourism"? Hopefully you will realize that they're talking about making a less than 1% change in the predicted outcome.
Mar 21, 2012 12:49 PM CDT
"Climate change" is just a way to refer to "global warming" without pushing human responsibility. The same people who don't believe humans are messing up the planet are the ones who moronically believe that Christ is going to restore a perfect earth anyway....