Judge Tosses Happy Meals Lawsuit
Mom, health activists want toys out of fatty kids meals
By Mary Papenfuss, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 6, 2012 12:09 AM CDT
Updated Apr 6, 2012 2:03 AM CDT
McDonald's all smiles.   (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)

(Newser) – California kids still have the right to chow down on Happy Meals. A San Francisco judge has tossed out a class-action lawsuit that aimed to block Happy Meal sales in the state. The suit claimed McDonald's was violating consumer protection laws by using toys to lure children to eat nutritionally unbalanced meals that can lead to obesity. The burger company is delighted. A spokeswoman said the "meritless" suit detracted from the "important issue of children's health and nutrition." She added: "We are proud of our Happy Meals."

The action was brought by a mom and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which called the use of toys to market food a "predatory practice that undermines parents, and harms kids' health." McDonald's "must stop exploiting children at some point," said the group's executive director. The suit aimed to bar the inclusion of toys in meals marketed to children, and sought no damages. The judge did not provide a reason why he tossed it out, reports the Los Angeles Times. The city of San Francisco currently bans toys in Happy Meals. But McDonald's has dodged the crackdown by selling the toys separately.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Judge Tosses Happy Meals Lawsuit is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 24 comments
Apr 7, 2012 8:39 AM CDT
Let me see if I've got this right. The parent of a child takes child TO McDonald's, buys Happy Meal FOR child, then attempts to get same food banned. Did said child hold a gun to parent's head and demand Happy Meal? Just what part of "NO" do parents not understand?
Apr 6, 2012 10:33 PM CDT
Apr 6, 2012 10:42 AM CDT
The Adult Happy meals, come with Condoms, Butt-Plugs, Dildos, and Lubricant instead of juice