Why Governors Are Ditching Their Mansions
It's like The Shining in there: staffer
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Apr 12, 2012 5:35 PM CDT
Visiitors enjoy cookies and sweets at the Alaska governor's mansion during the traditional holiday open house on Dec. 6, 2011, in Juneau, Alaska.   (AP Photo/Becky Bohrer)

(Newser) – One of the perks of being a governor is getting to live in the executive mansion—but many governors are skipping out on the offer, writes Jodi Kantor in the New York Times. For some, it's because of the huge amount of responsibility that comes with living in a public spot. Admirers of the "grand and glorious" buildings "don’t realize the politics that go into what you’re going to eat for breakfast or refinishing the floors," says Jenny Sanford, South Carolina's onetime first lady.

It's particularly tough in a time when the public is suspicious of government spending. "Who wants to live in a Downton Abbey house on a Tea Party budget?" asks Kantor. For others, the place is simply too big: Colorado's reminds a staffer of The Shining. States are trying to find a cost-effective solution for the buildings. Idaho has considered selling its mansion, but opponents worried it would look "desperate"; South Carolina and Colorado rent rooms out for parties; others may become simply tourist attractions. Click through for more on the mansions' fates.

View 4 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Why Governors Are Ditching Their Mansions is...
13%
18%
46%
5%
17%
0%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 6 comments
Tology
Apr 13, 2012 4:08 AM CDT
Don't forget the fact that they can spend millions of taxpayer dollars on security systems and upgrades to their private houses like John Kasich of Ohio did.
myflap.blow
Apr 12, 2012 11:31 PM CDT
"...and there's no frickin elevator for my Escalades"
finkster
Apr 12, 2012 6:20 PM CDT
Make them into homeless shelters since you politicians have put everyone out of work