Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Prostate Cancer Shocker: Surgery Does Nothing?

Specialists await full results of 12-year study

By Neal Colgrass,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 28, 2012 1:54 PM CDT

(Newser) – Cancer experts are nervously awaiting the publication of a new study that may revolutionize the treatment of prostate cancer, the Independent reports. First revealed at a urology conference in February, the 12-year study of 731 men showed that standard prostate cancer surgery did nothing to prolong life. "The only rational response to these results is, when presented with a patient with prostate cancer, to do nothing," says a British specialist.

In fact, prostate cancer is so slow-growing that in 50% of British cases, men end up dying of something else. Some specialists question whether it should even be labeled a "cancer" at all. Others are casting doubt on the new study, saying it focused on older, particularly low-risk men, who would never have had surgery in the UK anyway. "We would offer milder treatment such as radiotherapy or watchful waiting," says a British urologist. "We are better than the US in putting men on surveillance." (In other prostate cancer news, read about a new procedure that may come without side-effects.)

Dr. Gautam Jayram assists during prostate cancer surgery, watching an internal video of the patient’s body, at the University of Chicago Medical Center in Chicago.
Dr. Gautam Jayram assists during prostate cancer surgery, watching an internal video of the patient’s body, at the University of Chicago Medical Center in Chicago.   (AP Photo/University of Chicago Medical Center, Bruce Powell)
Prostate cancer surgery may do nothing to prolong life, according to a new study.
Prostate cancer surgery may do nothing to prolong life, according to a new study.   (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
65%
6%
6%
17%
5%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 11 comments
MattHelm
May 1, 2012 7:42 AM CDT
Once again the natural alternative to a needless EXPENSIVE medical establishment bullshit treatment is better. http://www.aacr.org/home/public--media/aacr-in-the-news.aspx?d=583
iCapeCoddotcom
Apr 29, 2012 9:21 AM CDT
2 yrs ago I had prostate cancer surgery.I was 51. Alot of younger guys have been found to have it since simple psa blood test can show signs of a problem. Test itself is controversial. The median age being dx is like 69. With a less aggressive case of pca it might take 15-20 for that 69 yo to have serious issues. I guess for THAT sub set of men, you could almost not identify it as a cancer, if you like. From my perspective, there is an entire different catagory of 40, and 50+ year old men, with more agressive variations of the cancer, where the unpleasant reality is that, left untreated, they could be 10 years away from death. Removal of a prostate that has effectivly "contained" the cancer in some of those men (as in sons, dads, grandfathers), can remove what might otherwise might become a painful - slow growing - and deadly disease. Surgery sucks. Dealing with the plumbing sucks. Radiation was an ugly solution. But what are you gonna do. Cancer.org says that In the US, 28,170 men will die of prostate cancer in 2012. The 2nd leading cause of cancer death. And they dont want to call it "cancer".
Tology
Apr 29, 2012 4:41 AM CDT
Like most cancer treatments,  (that 90% of doctors themselves will turn down in favor of quality of life),  all they do is fill the pockets of hospitals and doctors at the expense of insurance companies, medicare and the patient. Read the fine print on the Cancer Treatment Centers of America next time you see an ad on television, the few people they save are the exception, most die.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne