Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Secret Service's Real Problem: It Endangers the President

Lax rules, shortcuts are rampant

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted May 2, 2012 1:57 PM CDT

(Newser) – Ronald Kessler, the former Washington Post reporter who originally broke the Secret Service sex scandal story to the Post, has news for you: Prostitution is far from the agency's biggest problem. Much worse is its "lax management culture that condones cutting corners, directly endangering the life of the president," Kessler writes in the Post. He offers a variety of examples, many gleaned from his book, In the President’s Secret Service: Behind the Scenes With Agents in the Line of Fire and the Presidents They Protect:

  • If an event is about to start and a long line is still waiting to be screened, campaign staffers as well as Bush and Obama White House staffers have been known to instruct the Secret Service to just let them in—a request backed by Secret Service managers.
  • Screening is suspended at one out of five major presidential and vice presidential events, a current agent says.
  • Agents are frequently allowed to fill out their own scores for firearms requalification and fitness tests, with managers not requiring they actually pass. Agents tell Kessler that one member of President Obama's detail often fails his handgun tests, and another is out of shape and unable to open the doors when exiting the president's limo. Management's solution: Tell limo drivers to park in such a way that the doors are easier for her to open.
  • President Obama, too, is at fault, Kessler declares: His repeated declarations of confidence in the Secret Service are "as reckless as President John F. Kennedy’s refusal to let agents ride on the rear running board of his limousine in Dallas"—had JFK allowed that, his life would have been saved.
"The Secret Service has been derelict in its duty to the American people and its own brave agents," Kessler writes. "It should not take another tragedy to bring about reform." Click for more disturbing examples from his column

Barack Obama is surrounded by Secret Service agents during a rally in Rodney Square February 3, 2008 in Wilmington, Delaware.
Barack Obama is surrounded by Secret Service agents during a rally in Rodney Square February 3, 2008 in Wilmington, Delaware.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
9%
6%
3%
6%
66%
10%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
ladyrosedeky
May 2, 2012 9:57 PM CDT
When Clinto ran for re-election, I attended three events. One as a reporter for the small newspaper I wrote for and the other as just an oridinary citizen. All three were large crowds and at all of them, everyone went through screening, even the press. There were bomb dogs going through Male High School constantly before the event. No room, and I mean no room including the restrooms were left unchecked. I find it hard to believe that they don't force the V.P. and President to wear bullet proof vest at all times when they are out. This never used to be. Maybe it is because they have the newer bullet proof clothing and no one knows about this. Many parents in England were purchasing this clothing for their children to protect them from being shot. However, I would still want the president to wear a vest - the Dragon vest is best.
NewsDude007
May 2, 2012 8:30 PM CDT
How stupid is to have all this knowledge out in the open?!!?!  For national security, they should not post all of these details?!?! Wow
Pamelafisk
May 2, 2012 2:20 PM CDT
I recall being at a large event in 2008 featuring President Obama, prior to his election, in San Francisco. A large portion of the crowd was screened and were seated in a slow but steady stream. Then, suddenly, just prior to Mr. Obama's arrival, a very large percentage of the total crowd streamed into the venue all at once. I recall thinking that the Secret Service probably just gave up on screening the crowd after a certain point. This story corroborates my thinking on this phenomenon. Why bother to screen only about 2/3s of the crowd, only to bypass screening for the rest of the crowd? The possibiliities for distasterous events such as asassinations are very high under these circumstances. This is scary news indeed.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne