Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Jamie Dimon Should Be on Trial

JPMorgan boss should face public questioning: Alex Pareene

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted May 14, 2012 10:48 AM CDT

(Newser) JPMorgan lost $2 billion last week, and it's time for the bank's CEO to answer for it. Congressional questioning isn't enough: Jamie Dimon should be required, ideally on prime-time TV, "to answer questions plainly and clearly, to an unfriendly audience of non-Davos people," Alex Pareene writes at Salon. We could lob simple questions, like: "Wouldn’t it have been better if that $2 billion had been used for almost anything in the world besides shady mega-bank gambling that no one understands?"

Dimon could explain to "JPMorgan shareholders, unemployed people, journalists, and angry bloggers" the role of the giant bank in a "healthy and functioning" economy. He could also tell us whether he lied on his first-quarter earnings reports, or simply didn't know what was going on. If it's the latter, "Jamie, I think maybe you should consider retirement; this bank is too complicated for you," Pareene writes. Sure, Dimon will probably never admit to any wrongdoing; but at least the showdown would be "very good television." Click through for Pareene's full piece.

JPMorgan Chase chief Jamie Dimon speaks to a lunchtime gathering of the Portland Business Alliance, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011 at the Portland Hilton in Portland, Ore. Occupy Portland marchers protested outside the hotel as Dimon spoke.
JPMorgan Chase chief Jamie Dimon speaks to a lunchtime gathering of the Portland Business Alliance, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011 at the Portland Hilton in Portland, Ore. Occupy Portland marchers protested outside...   (AP Photo/The Oregonian, Randy L. Rasmussen)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Dimon has convinced himself that his firm is making our economy function better instead of just playing incredibly complex computer games with unimaginable sums of other people’s money. - Alex Pareene

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
3%
3%
3%
67%
2%
23%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 15 comments
NobodyKnows
Aug 31, 2012 1:10 PM CDT
What kills me is that these incompetents were paid so much while they were screwing up. The company could have saved another fortune hiring me to do it.
sundaysilence89
May 14, 2012 9:12 PM CDT
This is such a non story unless Washington decides to send them some bail out money.  They made a bad investment.  So what?  If something was done illegally the SEC can go Martha Stewart on them.  We definitely do not need more regulations.  The banking industry is still trying to digest the Dodd-Frank idiocracy. 
shaboom
May 14, 2012 7:24 PM CDT
It's 2 billion before you add in lost stockholder value. This will hit 20 billion.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne