Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

This Time, Iran Nuke Talks Might Actually Work

They start Wednesday, amid signs of real hope

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted May 19, 2012 9:06 AM CDT

(Newser) – Negotiators from Iran sit down with those from the US and five other nations Wednesday, and a rare thing is emerging from much of the advance coverage—a sense that Tehran is genuinely ready to curb its nuclear program. The New York Times says as much today with its top story, on the heels of earlier pieces with a similar sentiment in the Wall Street Journal and the Guardian.

The gist is that Iranian sanctions already in place have begun to take a real toll, and things will tighten even more in July when an EU ban on oil purchases takes effect. Ahead of the talks, Iran seems serious about shipping out all its weapons-grade uranium and ceasing the enrichment of any more. There's no guarantee of a breakthrough, of course, and Benjamin Netanyahu is as pessimistic as ever, notes the Christian Science Monitor. The Journal's Gerald Seib offers a reminder of the stakes: "If serious diplomacy is going to take root, this month is when it will have to happen. If not, Israeli or American military action to stop Iran becomes much more likely."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in a 2007 file photo.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in a 2007 file photo.   (AP Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
16%
11%
7%
50%
9%
7%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 26 comments
ladyrosedeky
May 19, 2012 1:21 PM CDT
Why does the media keep putting old pictures of the insignificat Imanutjob along side stories regarding any negotiations when he isn't the one in Iran's government that has the power to negotiate. It is the Ayatollah who has the power to negotiate and only the Ayatollah. So why doesn't the media put pictures of the Ayatollah in these news stories?
anonymous191919
May 19, 2012 1:09 PM CDT
It'd be great if this worked out but I'd be a little surprised. I'm not sure some haphazard efforts of diplomacy can overcome a US foreign policy which has been deeply flawed for the past 60 years. Actually I suppose it's not flawed - it's just pursued a different goal: namely political and economic control rather than peace. The two main instruments used by the US, sanctions and occupation, have over the years proven to be completely ineffective in terms of diplomacy, peace, and even the spread of democracy. People never seem to remember that the dangerous Islamic-fundamentalist country Iran actually had a democratic election in 1953, that is until the US violently overthrew it. Despite what the media tries to tell you, the US doesn't want a peaceful, democratic Middle East. It just wants a submissive one. It wants to prop up leaders that will sell out their people for the benefit of US oil corporations and often times it's successful (i.e. Saudi Arabia). This constant and frequently violent interference is what gets the Middle Eastern people so angry and incites them to join terrorist organizations. And until the American people understand that and recognize their government's true intentions, we'll be doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past, spending ourselves into an unrecoverable crisis and losing the lives of thousands of young American soldiers all while making our country less and less safe. The neo-Conservatives are already spreading propaganda in preparation for an invasion of Iran. Don't listen to them.
ProbolyKnot
May 19, 2012 12:10 PM CDT
Obama's Iran foreign policy is working... without murder or mayhem. but all the little-minded Obama haters say it aint so.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne