Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Facebook Ads a Flop: Poll

Ads, comments only influence a fifth of users

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 5, 2012 1:50 AM CDT | Updated Jun 5, 2012 1:52 AM CDT

(Newser) – General Motors was right when it said Facebook ads weren't effective, a Reuters poll finds. Only a fifth of Facebook users say they have ever bought something because of ads or comments on the social network, the poll found—and 34% say they are spending less time on the site than six months ago, while 20% say they are spending more. The poll highlights worries about Facebook's ability to make money from its user base, which is, nevertheless, huge: Only 21% of those polled said they had no Facebook account.

Facebook is still perfecting its advertising, but "comments and recommendations from friends on Facebook do carry a lot of weight, so I'm surprised by the number," says an industry analyst. Facebook didn't comment on the details of the study, but pointed to case studies including Applebee's, a restaurant chain whose Facebook ads delivered a threefold return on investment, according to findings. Facebook shares closed at a new low of $26.90 yesterday, down 29% from its IPO on May 18.

Ads, comments, and likes on Facebook aren't translating into strong sales for companies.
Ads, comments, and "likes" on Facebook aren't translating into strong sales for companies.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
68%
12%
0%
5%
2%
12%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
i2ollingstone
Jun 5, 2012 10:37 AM CDT
FB advertising was one of the biggest reasons I deleted mine.  I find it quite offensive that just because I'm a male and I told FB that I liked men that it gave me very selective ads.  For a while I took away that it mentioned I was gay just because of the ads.  Now I don't have FB at all.  Fuck that data-mining bullshit.
the bookchuck
Jun 5, 2012 10:10 AM CDT
Tank mentioned something that always gets avoided in these "How FB can make money" articles; AdBlock or similar programs. If I want to buy something or learn about a company, I'll go do that, but not through some extraneous, impulse-driven, spur-of-the-moment pop-up or border ad (which I'll never actually see). They may have X million/billion people there, but they won't even suggest how many have blocking software, which I suspect is quite a few. Who doesn't have a spam e-mail blocker, these days? True, some may like the ads but some of us like our software assistants (and undisturbed travels) a whole lot more. Yeah, I have detailed profile and you can target me all you want, but the back-end detail is the bitch; I and probably many others have lots of little secretaries working to keep your junk ads, and mail, away from our eyes. Oh, they'll get their ad revenue based on tank's logic (some folks will bite), just not the results (or numbers of eyes) that they would have advertisers believe that they're getting. To paraphrase Baudelaire; The greatest trick that the advertisers ever played was convincing the world that the uninterested consumer (viewer) does not exist. They do, perhaps even in numbers, but you'll never see us mentioned, esp. as a number or as a percentage, anywhere in one of these semi-analytical articles.
Yourself
Jun 5, 2012 10:10 AM CDT
1) glad i don't use FB 2) somewhat surprised the number is 21% of people don't have an account. 3) even if i did use it, ad-block is my best friend. I turned it off once, and was blown away as to how difficult it is to view/enjoy websites (yeah, Newser, you're just as insanely guilty!) 
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne