Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

9/11 Health Fund to Cover Cancer

Science still out, but official says covering victims more important

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 9, 2012 5:59 AM CDT

(Newser) – After years of the government refusing to cover cancers developed in the aftermath of 9/11, a federal health officer has reversed course, adding 50 types of cancer to the $4.3 billion fund set up to treat first responders as well as people who lived, worked, or attended school in Lower Manhattan at the time, reports the New York Times. The policy change comes despite a continued lack of hard evidence linking cancer to the attacks, but a report in Lancet last year that found firefighters who responded to the 9/11 attacks suffered a nearly 20% higher cancer rate, as well as recommendations made in March, were enough to alter regulations.

"I think it's an important statement that the country's going to take care of the workers and people who are there to save the lives of the people of the city," said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, the primary sponsor of the 2010 law that created the fund. But the new policy promises to be challenging, as it is difficult to distinguish between people who came down with cancer from the toxic substances released on 9/11 and those who might have gotten it anyway. (That shouldn't matter, Jon Stewart has argued.)

In this Oct. 11, 2001 file photo, firefighters make their way over the ruins of the World Trade Center through clouds of smoke at ground zero in New York.
In this Oct. 11, 2001 file photo, firefighters make their way over the ruins of the World Trade Center through clouds of smoke at ground zero in New York.   (AP Photo/Stan Honda, Pool)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
0%
3%
6%
88%
0%
3%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
Plato
Jun 9, 2012 8:12 PM CDT
 Our federal government has appropriated 7.4 billion taxpayers dollars to monitor and treat injuries {toxic dust} and to provide compensation for job and economic losses of anyone that was around at the time of 9/11. No major federal financial assistance was made available to the survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing of April 1995, there were 168 deaths 19 were children.  I ask you now, is that because one was in New York City and the other was in Oklahoma ??  That is a reasonable question, what do you think ?
TiredMemeCat
Jun 9, 2012 11:25 AM CDT
In a more Karmic world, it would be paid for by former Reagan (for creating Bin Laden) and Bush (for ignoring clear threats) officials.
MisterPlinkett
Jun 9, 2012 10:12 AM CDT
the first responders weren't allowed at the 10 year 9/11 anniversary memorial service.  never forget that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S89aonVQodo 
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne