Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

EPA's New Soot Rules Pose Threat to Obama

11 states demanded action on air pollution, but others will likely be irked

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 15, 2012 9:13 AM CDT

(Newser) – The Obama administration didn't want to tighten air pollution regulations until after the election—but lawsuits from 11 states have forced its hand. The Environmental Protection Agency will today announce a proposal for stricter rules on allowable soot levels. Though a final decision won't come until December, the proposal itself could open the floodgates of GOP criticism in swing states like Pennsylvania and Ohio, where Republicans could argue the new standards will kill jobs, the AP reports.

But "the science is clear, and overwhelming evidence shows that particle pollution at levels currently labeled as officially 'safe' causes heart attacks, strokes, and asthma attacks," says a rep for the American Lung Association. The administration says the new rules, prompted by thorough scientific investigation, won't require any major upheaval in most US counties. The new rule would set the maximum allowable standard for soot in a range of 12 to 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air, down from the current standard of 15 micrograms per cubic meter.

This photo taken April 17, 2012, shows Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson during an interview with The Associated Press.
This photo taken April 17, 2012, shows Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson during an interview with The Associated Press.   (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf)
Barack Obama speaks on the economy during a campaign event at the Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland, Ohio, on June 14, 2012.
Barack Obama speaks on the economy during a campaign event at the Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland, Ohio, on June 14, 2012.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
29%
3%
8%
48%
1%
10%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 14 comments
GenericLeftist
Jun 15, 2012 4:51 PM CDT
Abolish the EPA and start over, they are too controlled by lobbyist are have become too partisan. They don't care how much they destroy the economy or business, they only account for their ideological cult of a "green planet"... What good is a green planet when the economy stops and unemployment is at 25%, it's already started I can drive through L.A. and count the homeless people by the thousands, which is a result of heavy regulation and high energy prices. When energy prices become sustainable and much lower than they are now, it makes ALL products cheaper if you account for shipping and travel costs on ALL products. We need a balance between protecting the environment and destroying business, there must be a happy medium.
mperloe
Jun 15, 2012 4:33 PM CDT
Unless we allow the GOP to reopen sweat shops, poison the environment and limit taxes to Democrats they will claim that Democrat policies will destroy jobs. It's too bad no one in the media calls them on this.
Ucantusethatname
Jun 15, 2012 3:15 PM CDT
"The science is clear, and overwhelming evidence shows that . . . " Wrong. It is clear that scientific findings change all the time. Until last week, for example, older men were supposed to visit the doctor annually for a prostate exam. Now, forgetabout it. Almost every older male will have prostate cancer. I bet that all the gas coming from the White House is just as damaging to my well-being as a little more dust or smog.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne