Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

The Pulitzer Fiction Debacle: What Really Happened

Juror Michael Cunningham: how they picked those books

By Neal Colgrass,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 15, 2012 5:00 PM CDT

(Newser) – All three books were good, but none of them won the Pulitzer Prize. Fiction lovers know the story: David Foster Wallace's The Pale King, Denis Johnson’s Train Dreams, and Karen Russell's Swamplandia! were all rejected by this year's Pulitzer Prize Board. Now fiction juror Michael Cunningham is speaking up, calling the result "surprising and upsetting to any number of people, prominent among them the three fiction jurors." He writes in The New Yorker that the jury "submitted three finalists, each remarkable (or so we believed) in its own way."

First, the jurors. NPR book critic Maureen Corrigan "was drawn to writers who told a gripping and forceful story." Susan Larson, host of NPR's The Reading Life, "wanted to fall in love with a book." Cunningham "was the language crank, the one who swooned over sentences." He admits that all three submissions were "controversial," but he considered The Pale King powerfully written, Train Dreams an "exhilarating, magical depiction of ordinary life," and Swamplandia! an original debut. But the Pulitzer board made the final decision, and didn't even request another possible winner, writes Cunningham: "No such call was made."

In this book cover image released by Little, Brown and Company, The Pale King, by David Foster Wallace, is shown.
In this book cover image released by Little, Brown and Company, "The Pale King," by David Foster Wallace, is shown.   (AP Photo/Little, Brown and Company)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
15%
49%
2%
0%
29%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
summerfairy
Jul 16, 2012 4:33 AM CDT
Seriously, does anybody outside those inbred, cigar smoking, scotch drinking liberals give a rat's ass about this?
shaboom
Jul 15, 2012 7:51 PM CDT
This is how awards rules should work. Just because there is material being issued, doesn't mean some book/film/show each year deserves to held in esteem, next to previous high-points/winners. Here's an idea: choose an ever-changing number of nominees that deserve to be considered according to the actual quality of the output that year. Some years you give out two awards. Some years you don't give out any. Creative endeavors aren't a f_cking sports playoff. Imagine what that could do for the feeble, godawful Oscars. Likewise for political campaigns. where when the third option wins (None of the above) , it means you throw out both candidates and start over.
JoeQ
Jul 15, 2012 7:42 PM CDT
Fiction is lying.  Just pick the one who lied best, and barring that, flip a coin and lie about it.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne