Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Georgia to Execute Man Deemed Mentally Retarded

State isn't convinced he meets the definition, despite court ruling

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 14, 2012 7:23 AM CDT

(Newser) – The US Supreme Court declared that the death penalty for mentally retarded criminals was unconstitutional in 2002. Georgia, however, is set to execute a prisoner so labeled next week, reports the Guardian. The execution of Warren Hill is proceeding because Georgia, alone among the states, says that learning disabilities must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." Even though Hill was found by a Georgia court in 2002 to be "mentally retarded," it was only by a lesser "a preponderance of the evidence" level. He's got an IQ of about 70.

Ironically, Georgia was the first state to ban the death penalty for people with learning disabilities, but when it instituted that law in 1988, it also demanded the tougher standard. Hill was already serving a sentence of life imprisonment for killing his girlfriend when he killed another prisoner 1990 and received the death penalty. "We are heading into a constitutional crisis," said Hill's lawyer. "The Supreme Court banned executions of mentally retarded prisoners, but here we are in Georgia about to execute a man who is mentally retarded." It's set to take place Wednesday.

Convicted murderer Warren L. Hill. Hill is scheduled to be put to death on July 18, 2012, even though he has been judged to be developmentally disabled.
Convicted murderer Warren L. Hill. Hill is scheduled to be put to death on July 18, 2012, even though he has been judged to be developmentally disabled.   (AP Photo/Georgia Department of Corrections)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
9%
3%
53%
20%
9%
5%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 63 comments
WilliamBramblett
Oct 6, 2012 10:03 PM CDT
One question... if this guy broke into your house one night and attempted to rape your daughter, would you shoot him, knowing he was "ratarted"?  So would I.  So why is it any different after the fact?  You could have killed him to prevent his crimes, but can't kill him once he's done?  What kind of BS world are we living in? 
jamiealex1569
Jul 16, 2012 2:49 PM CDT
Because really it's not to hard to bomb a competency test when you try to. He killed his girlfriend, and got life, but no that wasn't good enough to teach him not to murder people. Yes he may be a stupid man, but not because he's mentally retarded. It's because he is a stupid fucking thug who does what he pleases! He made it in the outside world for how long before he killed his girlfriend? Was he on disability for his mental condition before he killed his girlfriend? Did he have an apartmrnt? Can he care for himself? Does he know to go to the restroom proplerly, or does he play with his shit, and not wipe his own ass? I'm so sick of people trying to claim all this mental shit when NOTHING is wrong with them besides that they decided to commit a crime. I say fry his ass! One less thug in the world, and one less mouth to feed with my tax dollars!
MissBrat
Jul 16, 2012 6:51 AM CDT
If proven "Mentally Retarded"  then why was he in prison? Why not in a State Hospital for people with disabilities to get the therapy he apparently  needs.......Others have killed, been proven "mental" and received life time care in a state Mental Hospital.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne