Sitting Is 'Fatal'? Show Me the Proof
Peter Katzmarzyk's 'sedentary lifestyle' study didn't prove the point
By Neal Colgrass,  Newser Staff
Posted Jul 21, 2012 4:37 PM CDT
Sitting alone may not shorten this guy's life. Now, the chips and the beer ...   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – So you've read that a sedentary lifestyle may be more dangerous than smoking? Hope you didn't buy a new stand-up desk, because the research in question failed to prove a link between inactivity and early death, writes The Numbers Guy at the Wall Street Journal: "It could be that people who spend more time sitting are less healthy to begin with, or that those who sit less are using that time in healthier ways such as exercising."

Dr. Peter Katzmarzyk's analysis of sedentary health risks was a so-called observational study—which amasses evidence toward cause and effect but doesn't prove it. Such studies "often are the closest scientists get to directly connecting behavior with lifespan," concedes The Numbers Guy. What's more, controlled studies that focus on the dangers of sedentary lifestyle would be both expensive and "ethically dubious." So while Katzmarzyk's work does make sense, that "doesn't mean the act of sitting itself is deadly."

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |