Romney Aides Lay Out Tough Foreign Policy
And imply Obama is responsible for ambassador's death
By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff
Posted Sep 14, 2012 9:00 AM CDT
Mitt Romney speaks during a campaign event at Van Dyck Park, Thursday, in Fairfax, Va.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(Newser) – Mitt Romney's aides are using the crisis in the Middle East as a backdrop to flesh out their candidate's foreign policy, and it's a hawkish one, the New York Times reports. Aides said that if Mitt Romney had been president over the past four years…

  • The US would have been actively involved in helping to form Libya's post-revolution government.
  • He'd have set down the kind of "red line" against Iran that Israel is looking for, using military action if Iran crossed a certain point in nuclear development. They said Romney wouldn't have allowed Iran to enrich uranium, though the Times points out that it was doing that during much of George W. Bush's second term.
  • The US would be "facilitating" the flow of arms to Syrian rebels, though not directly arming them. One Obama aide quips that it "sounds a lot like they are endorsing our position."

All the positions are much more detailed than anything Romney himself has said on the campaign trail. The aides also attacked President Obama over the Libya crisis in especially harsh terms. "There is a pretty compelling store that if you had a President Romney, you'd be in a different situation," one adviser told the Washington Post. "For the first time since Jimmy Carter, we've had an American ambassador assassinated. … The respect for America has gone down, there's not a sense of American resolve."